News world
The British Higher Court of Canada's local time on Wednesday (27th) ruled that Huawei executives Meng Wanzhou's criminal was established, which means that Meng Wanzhou will face a lawsuit that is extradited to the United States.
Before the verdict, some public opinion in China was optimistic about the Meng Wanzhou case and believed that Canada did not participate in the U.S. sanctions on Iran. The United States accused Meng Wanzhou in violation of the sanctions on Iran's crimes in the Canadian judicial system. Meng Wanzhou did not have double crimes.
However, the British High Court ruled that the optimistic emotions of Chinese public opinion also made Meng Wanzhou rumors as soon as possible to return to China in early June to become a bubble.The reason for the Canadian judge is that although Canada has not imposed economic sanctions on Iran like the United States, the United States has accused Meng Wanzhou for false statements and suspected financial fraud.No conflict with Canada's values.
In other words, whether Meng Wanzhou's crime in Canada is not the main consideration of the BC High Court. The court considers more about the common values of Canada and the United States.
This ruling caused different response in China, Canada and the United States.The Chinese Embassy in Canada issued a statement yesterday, expressing strong dissatisfaction and resolute opposition to the ruling, saying that Canada plays the role of American accomplice.
The Canadian government emphasized before the ruling that no matter how the court judged the Meng Wanzhou case, the Canadian government did not need to apologize or explain the decision of the independent judicial system.
The U.S. Ministry of Justice spokesman thanks to the Canada for continued to help the United States on the issue of extradition Meng Wanzhou.
In fact, the Meng Wanzhou case is not a simple judicial issue. Behind it is the game between China and the United States and the three parties.
For China and the United States, the Meng Wanzhou case is one aspect of struggle between the two sides of the China Telecom giant Huawei.In May last year, the United States included Huawei in the entity list of sanctions, and upgraded sanctions on Huawei again in May this year.Obviously, the United States has suppressed Huawei as the focus of suppressing China's high -tech development. The Meng Wanzhou case is an important starting point for suppressing Huawei.
As of now, China has not made substantial counterattacks against Huawei, showing that China is not willing to completely tear its face with the United States in the world.However, China did not have a soft hand to Canada. Within a few days of the Geng Fang detained Meng Wanzhou, China arrested two Canadian citizens in harmful Chinese national security.
For Canada, which is sandwiched between China and the United States, the Meng Wanzhou case is always a hot potato: After all, the United States is the most important ally in Canada. The two sides have the same values and judicial system.Dissatisfaction is also difficult to explain to domestic public opinion; if Meng Wanzhou is extradited, not only will two arrested Canadian citizens difficult to get freedom, but also may attract further revenge on China.Perhaps, the Meng Wanzhou case is in a long judicial process to drag it, which is the best choice for Canadian.
Meng Wanzhou inadvertently involved in the game of China and the United States and Canada, which is her personal misfortune.But she has no choice now and can only wait for the elusive fate.
