On April 28, Sun Yang appealed to the Swiss Federal Court two months ago by Sun Yang's eight years ago by the CAS for eight years ago. It has been half a month to this day.
According to the Red Star News, the Supreme Court of the Swiss Federation has officially accepted Sun Yang's appeal at 4A_192 / 2020, but the details of the case are still in a sealed state.This also means that Sun Yang's appeal is about to enter the final trial stage. Perhaps shortly after, he will decide the final ending of the athlete.
On February 28th, Beijing time, CAS announced a ruling. Sun Yang was banned for eight years and took effect from now.At the same time, the Chinese Swimming Association took the initiative to explain that at the same time, it supported Sun Yang Weiquan.Sun Yang said he would appeal.Lawyer Zhang Qihuai issued a statement that he will appeal to the Switzerland Supreme Court within 30 days.
It was originally scheduled to be on March 28. The last period of its appeal, but due to the epidemic, the Supreme Court of the Swiss Federal Federation closed all business from March 20.To this end, Sun Yang's appeal period was also postponed until April 28.Previously, according to the swimming world report, Sun Yang appealed at the last moment, hoping to reject the CAS (International Sports Arbitration Court) agreed with WADA (World Anti -Doping Agency) ruling.The Swiss Federal Court said: Sun Yang's appeal was proposed on April 29 (local time).
The Supreme Court of the Swiss Federation stated that they had officially accepted Sun Yang's appeal at 4A_192 / 2020, but the details of the case were still in a sealed state.Due to the influence of the new crown epidemic, the Swiss Federal Court has not been able to work properly before. On May 7th local time, the official website of the Switzerland Supreme Court released news, saying that it will gradually return to normal judicial operations from May 11, local time, but unless it cannot be completed at homeIn addition to the work and other situations that must appear at the scene, employees are required to continue at home, which may delay the process of the next case of Sun Yang appeal.
For Sun Yang, there are many recent disadvantages.Darren Middot, Executive Chairman of the International Swimming Federation of Legal Committee; Kane recently wrote a column for the Sydney Pioneer Morning News recently, which clearly stated that the opportunity of Sun Yang's appeal is very small.In accordance with relevant regulations, the Swiss Federal Court will not consider specific cases when dealing with appeals. The jurisdiction of its jurisdiction focuses on the law.There are only the following five aspects that allow the Swiss Federal Court to overthrow the decision of CAS MDash; MDash; the designated or arbitral court's illegal regulations for the formation of the arbitration or arbitration;The court is super or missed; the basic principles of violation of procedures; and the ruling is violated with Swiss public policies.
Dalon Middot; Kane said that the first three types of situations are not related to the case itself, and they are not mentioned during the hearing.The basic principles of the fourth type of illegal procedure, Kane believes that the probability of this case is not high. First, the translation problem or proceedings involved in the lawsuit. Although Sun Yang's mother tongue is not English, Sun Yang's translator is hired by Sun Yang himself.At the same time, the translation was also recognized by Sun Yang in advance and re -translated in advance.The second is that Sun Yang's lawyer also obtained the same right of listening and statement as Wada's lawyers.In Kane's view, it has become the only possible breakthrough in Sun Yang's violation of public policies.However, only in violation of the basic legal principles and values of Switzerland can the case be achieved.Kane said that CAS has been banned in the 8 -year ban on Sun Yang, and has not violated the Swiss public policy, and observes the world's anti -doping codes mdash; mdash; unless Sun Yang is sentenced to a lifetime forbidden, it will be based on strict judgment and too long for the ban.The reasons for appeal will be invalid.
