Hubei writer Fang Fang recently accepted an interview with the Financial Magazine, and once again responded to the questions from all walks of life, including diary publishing, diary naming, diary authenticity, writing motivation, personal identity, personal property and other issues.
Drive you the key points:
1. Why are you publishing overseas?
The current public opinion is very divided, and no publisher in China dares to pick up.
2. How can overseas publish so fast and smooth?
In the process of writing, some publishers asked, including some sinologists, translators, and even intermediary agents, so they translated while writing, and the translation movements were not very slow.
Fang Fang provides a timeline:
In early March, the global copyright was fully entrusted to the agent.
On April 14, submitted the manuscript.
It is currently pre -sale. It is truly published and listed in August (some countries are June). The agent believes that the diary is time -effective, so many processes are accelerated.If it is effective, in the era of such a science and technology development, it is not difficult to publish a book in two or three months, and some can be published in a few days.
3. How much income will there be?
There are not many. If the books are not published in China, only the overseas version will be published, and the agent, translation and their own three -party account will not be as much as there will be.
4. Netizens recommend renamed Fangfang Diary, not Wuhan diary.
Many books are called XX city diary, and Hollywood movies are named in the United States, so you must understand that this is a square Wuhan diary.This personal diary only represents Wuhan recorded by her.Others can also write his own Wuhan diary.
5. Will renames be a little less controversial?
Why change, there is no reason to change, I will never be abducted by others.
6. During the period of stopping to submission, do you modify the diary?
Make a little modification and add some introduction to the city of Wuhan. I didn't think there was any inappropriate content. The basic content was almost the same as that of the Internet. I keep it.Essence
7. Some people question that some of the details you record are inconsistent with the facts, and there are suspicions of hearing.
Fang Fang's answer mentioned two key points MDASH; mdash; the Internet and their own sources, give everyone the original taste:
The Internet has given us great communication convenience, and we can do not leave home and learn information.
Especially people like me, I have lived in Wuhan for more than sixty years. Elementary school and high school university, workers are reporters as editors, people I know live at all levels of Wuhan City. Many of these people are on my WeChat.In the circle of friends, do I know that information is difficult?Is the information I got from acquaintances more inaccurate than the information interviewed by reporters?
A person, he tells the truth to his acquaintances, or is he telling reporters more?Including officials, they told reporters a lot to reporters on the table, or do they tell people who are familiar with?These are not common sense.
I have been the vice chairman of the Hubei Youth Federation of Hubei Province and two members of the National Youth Federation. From the Standing Committee of the Provincial People's Congress to the Standing Committee of the Provincial Political Consultative Conference, I have opened a full 25 -year Standing Committee. Do you think my source will have fewer sources?In fact, I did n’t write more content. I was afraid of scaring everyone. I recorded most of them.
In today's era of Internet, some people say that the information I get at home is fake. Do people who say this do n’t know about the powerful ability of the Internet?Those who know much more than I know the Internet also use this as a weapon to attack me. Is this stupid or bad?
What is second -hand information?If I use second -hand information, others may be three -handed, four -handed and five -handed.Everyone saw the same video, and the reporter saw it. The reporter wrote that it was first -hand. I wrote it?It's okay.
8. The details of the funeral home mobile phone have been questioned the most, and have they responded and explained again.
The whole thing is to be trap and slander:
A doctor's friend did pass to me a photo, which was the photo of the mobile phone.However, I didn't post photos, and I just thought in the text.Someone found a photo of the second -hand mobile phone market in order to frame me, coupled with my text, and then said that what I saw was that photo.
After I issued a statement, the man deleted his Weibo and apologized.Unfortunately, the rumors have been spread. No matter how I explain, there are still many people who still think that the photo of the second -hand mobile phone is distributed in the diary.
Then, they asked me to show real photos to determine that I was not a rumor.This is ridiculous, you make rumors, why should I be innocent in accordance with your instructions?Of course, I have no right to disclose this photo without the consent of a doctor's friend.It is more and more scolding to me. It is from this photo.Their fragments were successful.
Isn't people still believe in such a photo with the early situation of the Wuhan epidemic and the situation that everyone knows later?For mobile phones, some experts in Hubei also wrote internal references, hoping to save those mobile phones. After the epidemic, give it to the telecommunications department to find the owner through the information as much as possible.inside.
In fact, I have said it twice about this photo.
But are they willing to listen?I guess I told you this time that they will not listen.
The simple understanding is that the photos of the Internet are really not true, but it is not that Fang Fang himself is attached to the diary. Because she is not authorized by a doctor and friends, she will not make it public.But similar scenes did happen. For example, some people wrote internal references and proposed to put the mobile phone as a relic in the memorial.
In this matter, the believers faithful, and the person who did not believe it was unbelievable, and she had nothing to explain.
9. Do you think your diary is not wrong?
I can tell you now: Except for a small place, there are wrong places (not clarified the next day), everything I write is real.
This interview is quite long, and I also mentioned how Fang Fang thinks Hu Xijin. Was she handinged knives and smearing China for Western countries. Whether she has six houses and has a series of issues such as personal interests and personal gains.Let's judge themselves.
(End)
