On April 1st, the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection issued the three halls of the National Commission for review. After the release of the sentence was released, why was the Supervisory Commission investigated the article and dissected Zhou Jiang, the former executive deputy director of the Urban and Rural Planning Committee of Hunan Province.
In December last year, Zhou Jiang was tried
Zhou Jiang was sentenced to three years in prison for committing bribery and released in August 2017.In March 2019, Zhou Jiang was investigated for other violations of discipline and law during his tenure.
In other words, Zhou Jiang is a second -entered palace.
The second time he was investigated, because the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection, the former deputy director of the Standing Committee of the Hunan Provincial People's Congress, found the clue of Zhou Jiang's serious violation of discipline and law.
The case shows that Zhou Jiang was born in October 1960 and from December 1994 to July 2008. He served as Deputy Director and Deputy Secretary of the Party Group from Changsha Planning Bureau; from July 2008 to February 2014, he successively served as Changsha's real estate management management management managementMember of the Party Committee and Deputy Director of the Bureau, a member of the Party Group and Deputy Director of the Changsha Housing Security Bureau, and a deputy cadre of the Changsha Housing Security Bureau, of which from February 2009 to February 2014, he was transferred to the Director of the Urban and Rural Planning Committee of LuzhouHe is also the director of the Office of Luzhou Urban -Rural Planning Committee.
In February 2014, Zhou Jiang was reviewed by the Changsha Discipline Inspection Commission for violation of discipline and law, and was detained in August of the same year.In June 2016, Zhou Jiang was sentenced to three years in prison by the People's Court of Yuelu District, Changsha City for bribery.
During his sentence, he could confess and regret, accept education transformation, and actively complete labor tasks. There was indeed repentance performance. On August 14, 2017, Zhou Jiang was subtracted for 7 days in prison and released on the day.
On March 20, 2019, Zhou Jiang was investigated by the Chenzhou Municipal Supervision Committee for suspected bribery crimes.In November 2019, the People's Procuratorate of Yongxing County filed a public prosecution to the Yongxing County People's Court for the crime of bribery and abuse of power.
On February 13 this year, Zhou Jiang was sentenced to five years in prison for committing bribery and abuse of power.
Why did Zhou Jiang be investigated by the Chenzhou Municipal Supervision Committee after the release of his sentence?
According to Liu Hongfeng, deputy director of the sixth review and survey office of the Chenzhou Discipline Inspection Commission, at the beginning of 2019, when the former deputy director of the Standing Committee of the Hunan Provincial People's Congress of the Central Discipline Inspection Commission, the former deputy director of the Standing Committee of the Hunan Provincial People's Congress found the original executive of the Urban and Rural Planning Committee of Luzhou CityDeputy Director Zhou Jiang had serious violations of discipline and law during his work during his work.
Zhou Jiang was closely related to Li Li. In February 2009, Xiang Lili, then the mayor of Luzhou City, deliberately borrowed Zhou Jiang from Changsha to the Chuzhou Urban and Rural Planning Committee as the executive deputy director.On March 18, 2019, the Hunan Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection will designate Zhou Jiang's suspicion of violations of the law.Liu Hongfeng said.
According to public resumes, Xiang Lili has been serving in Changsha for a long time. After 2007, he served as deputy director and chief of the Hunan Provincial Department of Commerce.Nian.In 2015, Xiang Li was transferred to the Secretary -General of the Hunan Provincial Government, his later deputy governor and deputy director of the Standing Committee of the Provincial People's Congress.
Xiang Lili trial
In other words, in early 2019, the State Commission of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection was investigating forces and involved Zhou Jiang's missed crime.
So, what crimes Zhou Jiang leaked?
The Yongxing County People's Court found out that from March 2002 to August 2008, Zhou Jiang was in charge of the Comprehensive Business Office and Land Use Planning Management Office during the deputy director of the Changsha City Planning Bureau.The main points of planning, the approval of the general plan, and the issuance of land use planning permits.
In March 2006, Changsha Mingyang Real Estate Development Co., Ltd., which was invested by Zhou Jiang's wife Xue Mou and others, jointly developed the Changsha Xingdian Times project with other companies.The project reporters are Xue Mou, and Hu Yin Company, which is invested by Xue Mou and others, designed it. There are 1322 households. According to the planning and design specifications of urban residential areas, the residential population should be 4,230.In order to avoid the regulations on the planning and construction management regulations of Changsha City Primary and Secondary Schools, every 4,000 residential areas shall allocate primary schools and kindergartens in accordance with standard planning, and design companies and developers shall be faked to residents. The number of residents is 3,966.
According to the relevant regulations and methods of the Changsha City Planning and Management Regulations of the People's Republic of China, the Land Planning Management Office must solicit functional departments such as education and fire protection before the approval of the general map approval.On August 17, 2006, the Xingdian era submitted a report to Zhou Jiang's opinion of the Signing Education Commission, requesting the approval of the overall map.On August 21, 2006, Zhou Jiang signed an consent of the opinions of the Education Commission during the single newspaper construction, which caused the opinions of the Xingdian Times Project in the general map approval section.Responsibilities of increasing costs.As an evaluation of Hunan Shengtai Real Estate Evaluation Co., Ltd., the loss value was RMB 22.827499 million.
In addition, from 2009 to 2014, Zhou Jiang was transferred to the Chuzhou Urban -Rural Planning Committee as executive deputy director, and used the convenience conditions formed by the convenience of his position or power and status.Provide help, and receive RMB 1.040644 million and HK $ 100,000 in the methods of dry stock dividends, low -cost houses, borrowing interest rates, etc.
According to Zhou Jiang's bribery and abuse of prison judgment published by the China Truth Document Network, Zhou Jiang truthfully reported the criminal facts of his bribery after arriving in the case.Before the investigation measures were taken to take the initiative to invest in the case, the criminal facts of the crime of abuse of power were truthfully confeed. They surrendered and could be given light penalties or reduce penalties according to law.Zhou Jiang voluntarily pleaded guilty and could punish him lightly; he refunded the stolen money and the illegal income of 19 million yuan from the Chenzhou Municipal Supervisory Committee, and he could punish him as appropriate.
On February 13 this year, Zhou Jiang was sentenced to four years in prison for bribery and fined 400,000 yuan.Gold RMB 400,000.From March 21, 2019 to March 20, 2024.The criminal income was RMB 10.4.0644 million and HK $ 100,000, and the treasury was paid.
Liu Hongfeng, deputy director of the sixth review and survey room of the Chenzhou Discipline Inspection Commission, said that the case is more special.First of all, the Zhoujiang case is a second -entered palace case.Zhou Jiang was sentenced to 3 years for his duty crime, involved in the case again, and was tapped deeply. Such cases were relatively rare.Secondly, as a person who came to, Zhou Jiang had experienced the entire process of review of the Discipline Inspection Commission, the investigation of the procuratorate, the court trial, and the prison implementation.The question, the case handler handles the Zhoujiang case as a zero -confession case and comprehensively collects evidence.Third, it is difficult to obtain evidence in this case.Its criminal behavior has taken a long time, and the fact that the facts have been difficult to have a difficult look, especially the suspected abuse of authority. The relevant departments have previously investigated it. Because of the inadequate collection of evidence, we have not been determined.Application and calculation of losses.
After the national public officials were expelled from public office and sentenced to punishment, they found that there were no missing crimes and did not investigate. What should I do?
Liu Hongfeng said that the supervisory organs still have the right to investigate and deal with.Because the object was once a public office, and the suspected criminal behavior occurred in the process of exercising the public power, the current status of the object did not affect the supervision jurisdiction.If within the scope of the time limit for prosecution stipulated in the Criminal Law, the supervision organs should be investigated and handled by the personnel who have been expelled from the public office due to crime.Specific to this case, although Zhou Jiang has been expelled from public office and released in prison, he still has some violations of discipline and laws that have not been investigated clearly. The Supervisory Commission shall investigate and deal with him according to law.
How to punish and determine the execution of the execution after the crime of leakage after the release of punishment?
Member of the Evaluation Committee of Yongxing County People's Court of Yongxing County and President of the Criminal Trial Hall said that we believe that according to the criminal law, the former sin has not yet been implemented, and the criminal responsibility is found to be found in the case of leakage.If the death penalty or life imprisonment, the principle of absorption is adopted, and only the death penalty or life imprisonment is performed. For those who sentence in prison, detention or control, the principle of restrictions and aggravation shall be under the total sentence of the total prison period, the maximum sentence of the two sentences, and the sentence period to be executed as appropriate shall be decided as appropriate.EssenceThe execution period should be calculated within the sentence of the new judgment decision, that is, first and then subtracted.If an additional punishment is sentenced in the number of crimes, the additional punishment still needs to be executed.The pre -sin has been implemented, and several crimes are imposed with the previous sin.Specific to the Zhoujiang case, he was released by his sentence. The former sin has been implemented, and he is now punished only on his missed crime.
