The person in charge of the investigation team emphasized in an exclusive interview with Xinhua News Agency that Li Wenliang is a member of the Communist Party of China and is not a hero and awakening of the system in the mouth of the hostile forces. It is intended to suppress the anti -system wave set off after Li Wenliang's death.
Chen Jing report
Wensiang, a doctor Li Wenliang, who was regarded as the 2019 coronary virus disease epidemic, died near one and a half months after his death. The Chinese official announced yesterday that the investigation results of the Li Wenliang incident were notified, and the Wuhan police also revoked his training to him.However, the investigation report did not respond to the problem of concealment of the epidemic that the public's most concerned, and only blamed the responsibilities on the police station of Li Wenliang, which caused the Chinese people to disappoint and trigger a strong cyber public opinion rebound.
The person in charge of the investigation team emphasized in an exclusive interview with the Chinese official media Xinhua News Agency that Li Wenliang was a member of the Communist Party of China and was not a hero and awakening of the system in the mouth of the hostile forces. It was intended to suppress the anti -institutional waves set off by the folk after Li Wenliang's death.
Interviewed scholars believe that the report does not explain whether there are deeper problems behind Li Wenliang's incident, not only difficult to respond to the expectations of the public, but also to improve the health and social management issues exposed to the epidemic.
During his lifetime, Li Wenliang was an ophthalmologist in Wuhan Central Hospital. On December 30 last year, he released the South China Fruit Seafood Market in the WeChat group to diagnose seven cases of Shas. He was regarded as the earliest whistle to send out the epidemic prevention and control warning to the outside world.However, he was subsequently punished by the Wuhan police in the name of rumoring and was trained by local police stations. One month later, he died of crown disease, which caused huge people's indignation in the Chinese people and attracted attention from international media.
Under the tremendous pressure of public opinion request for Li Wenliang's name and accountability of relevant officials, the National Supervision Committee of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China was sent to Wuhan on the day of Li Wenliang's death to fully investigate the relevant issues involving Li Wenliang.
The report issued by the investigation team yesterday sorted out the process of issuing WeChat early warning information, accepting police training, and infection and rescue of Li Wenliang. Finally, the conclusion was drawn: the police station issued improper admonitions and irregular law enforcement procedures. It is recommended that the supervision and correction of the Wuhan city supervision organs conduct supervision and correctionThe police urged the police to withdraw the training and investigate the responsibilities of the relevant personnel.The Wuhan police then revoked the commandment and gave administrative records to the deputy director of the police station instructed by Li Wenliang to give administrative warnings to the police who issued the training.
When many Chinese netizens spoke on social media, it was difficult to hide the disappointment and anger of the investigation report.Some netizens asked: After waiting for more than a month, let us see this?Some netizens throw a series of questions: Who reports Li Wenliang?Who wants to police station to teach him?Who doesn't let the doctor tell the truth?Why didn't the report mention?Some people are ironic: After investigation for so long, it is more appropriate to push the pot to the grassroots.
When the person in charge of the investigation team accepted an exclusive interview with Xinhua News Agency, it was further explained whether Li Wenliang's behavior belonged to rumors and whether he was treated with hospital treatment and retaliation.The person in charge believes that although Li Wenliang does not intentionally disrupts the public order, it is reposted without verifying the information without any accurate understanding of the epidemic;There is no qualification for his physician practice.
The above statement was immediately refuted by netizens.Some people quoted the Global Times' visit to the doctor of Wuhan Central Hospital that the hospital originally planned to expel Li Wenliang. Other doctors had been warned by leaders not to wear masks and not talking nonsense, otherwise they would be expelled like Li Wenliang.
Ren Jianming, a professor at the School of Public Management of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, pointed out in an interview with Lianhe Morning Post that Li Wenliang, the most watched by public opinion, spent more than 40 days. In the end, it was only suggested that the local government agencies in Wuhan were held accountable.The gap makes it difficult for the people to understand and accept.
He analyzed that what the public wants to understand through investigation is whether there is a concealment in the early days of the epidemic, whether the epidemic reporting mechanism is open and transparent, and whether the relevant departments are responsible for their due diligence.
