The hearing of the Meng Wanzhou case will be held on the 20th of this month.(Reuters)
The High Court of British Columbia, Canada, will once again hold a hearing on Canada's request for illegal arrest of China Huawei Corporation's executive Meng Wanzhou on the 20th of this month.
According to the Global Times, a number of Canadian media reproduced the Canadian News Agency yesterday that the Canadian legal expert called on the Minister of Justice to end the case.
It is reported that Meng Wanzhou's arrest has caused Sino -Canadian relations for more than a year, and many observers are eagerly looking for solutions.The hearing on January 20 will focus on double criminal issues, that is, the United States' crime of Meng Wanzhou is also a crime in Canada.If the judge ruled that the allegations against Meng could not meet the conviction criteria, she would be able to leave Canada freely.Meng's legal team said the essence of the case was the US sanctions on Iran, and Canada did not impose sanctions on Iran.
According to Katthemato, some people want the Canadian Minister of Justice David Middot; Rameti involved.The Canadian extradition lawyer Gary Middot; Bao Ting said that Lameti has the legal power of the legal procedure of the case at any time, and the court must obey any decision.It is reported that it is unclear at present, and what the relationship between the two close allys of the United States and Canada will mean if the extradition of the United States refusing to the United States.However, Bao Ting, an expert on extradition law, always believes that the end of the Meng Wanzhou case will not have much impact.He said that many ridiculous things are happening in North America, and they are basically between the United States and Canada. The case is unknown in this chaos.
The Canadian Ministry of Justice stated in a statement that the ministerial minister did not make any decisions related to extradition, unless the judicial commissioned him to make a decision, only by then, the judicial minister would decide whether to submit Meng to the request to extradite to the extradition.State (United States), this is in line with the independence of Canada's judicial system.
Yves Tiberghien, a professor of political science at the University of British Columbia and an expert in Asian issues, said that Canadian Minister of Justice can suspend judicial procedures at any time in accordance with the law, but this power is not used in reality. It is now politically full of risks.It is true that the case is costly.In essence, just as China has become the world's second largest economy and the second power, the relationship between Canada and China has fallen into a frozen state, and he said.On the other hand, because the case has passed more than a year, Canada has always claimed that the case was reasonable and legal, and strictly abide by the rule of law.If we are interference now, it looks like we are crushed.The expert said that if the court hearing will be performed according to the plan, the Justice Minister will be more willing to wait for the decision, and it will be much clearer if the court ruling will be cleared.Then it will not be questioned.
