Sun Xiaoguo was tried in the Higher People's Court of Yunnan Province in China on the 23rd.(News website of the Political and Legal Committee of the CPC Central Committee)

On the 23rd, China ’s Higher Court of Yunnan Province was pronounced publicly on the retrial of Sun Xiaoguo, and decided to perform the death penalty of Sun Xiaoguo, deprived of political rights for life, and confiscated all personal property.

According to the surging news report, the Higher Court of Yunnan Province was sentenced to Sun Xiaoguo's crime of rape in 1997, forced insults to women, intentional injury, and retrial of the crime of provoking trouble.The second instance judgment made in March was indeed wrong with Sun Xiaoguo's conviction and punishment.The 25 -year final judgment of the sentence was sentenced to merged, and it was decided to make the above judgment on Sun Xiaoguo.

The trial found that Sun Xiaoguo was sentenced to three years in prison by the Panlong District Court of Kunming in December 1995 for the crime of rape in 1994. After the appeal, he was ruled to reject the appeal and maintained the original sentence.During the handling of the case, his parents helped Sun Xiaoguo illegally obtain bail pending trial and medical treatment by falsifying medical records, resulting in two years, four months and twelve days of failure to execute the sentence.

During the execution of the unsuitable supervision, Sun Xiaoguo raped four minor girls with violence and coercion from April to June 1997. Among them, one of them raped one young girl at all.It is particularly serious plot such as hijacking and rape in public places. At the same time, it also has a number of statutory or depending on the penalty of the victim's personal freedom, rape, rape minors, crimes during the execution of penalties, crimes and re -crimes.

On November 7, 1997, Sun Xiaoguo and his associates held two 17 -year -old girls in public places to violent injuries and humiliation against the two.Crime.On July 13 and October 22, 1997, Sun Xiaoguo and others wanted to chase, intercept and beat others in public places to be injured in three victims, destroying social order, and bad circumstances, and his behavior constituted a crime of provocation.

The re -judgment of the Yunnan Provincial High Court believes that Sun Xiaoguo ignored the law and implemented crimes many times. The crime methods were extremely cruel, the crime was extremely serious, the social impact was extremely bad, the social harm was extremely deep, the subjective and viciousness was extremely dangerous.Criminals with great sin.

The judgment believes that there are indeed errors in the original retrial and the second trial of the case, and this retrial was corrected.In February 1998, the first instance of the Kunming Intermediate Court identified Sun Xiaoguo's crime of rape, sentenced to death, and deprived of political rights for life., Three years in prison; two years, four months, and twelve days of the crime of committing rape in 1994, the crime and twelve days were punished, and the death penalty was decided to deprive the political rights for life.Keep it.

During the retrial, the first instance of the Yuxi City Court of Yuxi City, Yunnan Province, determined that Sun Xiaoguo had committed the organization, the crime of led the underworld organization, the crime of opening the casino, the crime of provoking trouble, the crime of intentional injury, the crime of obstructing the testimony, bribery.The number of crimes was punished, and it was decided to implement a period of 25 years in prison, deprived of political rights for five years, and confiscated all personal property.

Yunnan Provincial High Court has tried the original conviction of Sun Xiaoguo's conviction of Sun Xiaoguo.The judgment has taken effect, and the punishment shall be implemented with the punishment determined by the retrial. It decides to perform the death penalty of Sun Xiaoguo, deprives political rights for life, and confiscates all personal property.

The re -trial of the Yunnan Provincial High Court will be submitted to the Supreme People's Court of China for approval.

Member of the Chinese CPPCC, representatives of the National People's Congress, media reporters and people from all walks of life listened to the case publicly.