Early North to read
Han Yonghong
Hu Xi, a Chinese media person and the editor -in -chief of Global Times, suddenly issued a public warning to the CCP cadres on Wednesday afternoon, reminding everyone not to ignore social reactions to pursue extreme political correctness.Although the language is unknown, many people understand it.
He wrote: I want to remind some cadres in various places that the vocabulary of democracy and freedom is the content in the core values of 24 -character socialism hell; hellip; if anyone thinks that a word of the core values is dazzling, it is necessary to be in them in themAvoiding daily work, then I think it must be that their understanding has a deviation.
He also directly warned them not to pursue the extreme lsquo; political correctness rsquo;, caused the masses to dislike, erode social confidence, and mention that some rough ideological work should be prevented.
The netizen's criticism of his intentions and the leadership, gave him more than 9,000 praises and about 3,000 reposts on Weibo, and Hong Kong and Taiwan media also reported.Everyone noticed that the day before, the official website of the Ministry of Education of China announced the amendment of the articles of association of the university. Among them, the charter of Shanghai Fudan University added a large amount of content related to the leadership of the Communist Party of China and the direction of socialist school running;The four words of freedom in the original chapter are gone.
Relevant news exploded public attention in an instant, and it was even more screenwriting in the circle of friends of Fudan alumni.Hu Xijin questioned that cadres felt that a word was dazzling, and it was obviously freedom.
It must be added here that the author reads the modified constitution of Fudan University, confirming that although the words of freedom of ideology are gone, the school in the original charter respects and protects academic freedom.Therefore, the more complete understanding, the authorities may be summarized: Fudan University respects and protects academic freedom, but the thought must be unified.
This statement issued by Fudan University on Wednesday night is explained: the amendment of the articles of association is the spirit of the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China and the National Education Conference, and further highlights the party's comprehensive leadership in school work.
In 2017, the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China was written into the party constitution. This has been established as the political principles and political reality of the Communist Party of China.The constitution of Fudan University in a century -old school to delete the freedom of thought, which surprised many people's hearts, especially after the burning book mdash; mdash; the so -called modern version of the Burning Book Confucian incident in the county -level library of Zhenyuan in Gansu.
In late October, Gansu Province ’s township government investigated and destroyed 65 books involved in tendencies. It was also publicly announced on the official website to publicize the burning book.The picture was fried in China earlier this month.Under the pressure of public opinion, the local government said that after investigation, it was found that the 65 were pirated illegal publications, and they promised to blame the improper behavior of burning books.
The above explanation is quite reluctant, but it confirms at least one important message: incineration involving tendencies is not a national unified instruction issued by the upper level.Conversely, this action stems from grass -roots officials to speculate and show political loyalty, and only claims to burn the book to show the public. As a result, not only causes anger, but also played iron plates politically.
After the Gansu burning incident, the university amended the articles of association immediately appeared. In addition to attracting strong attention, both may not have a great substantial impact or absolute necessity.In this case, the relevant personnel are still here. It can be seen that these actions are derivatives generally turning in the atmosphere of society, and there are not many loose spaces in China that are even reduced.China is corresponding to the pressure of the US trade war and institutional competition. It is necessary to adhere to the principle and prevent overloading. It is not easy to stifle free space.serious.
Hu Xijin actually posted two Weibo on the afternoon of the 18th.He claimed to be on the latter Weibo that the Global Times has been standing on the front line of fighting against Western anti -China and unfriendly forces.Don't force yourself to the opposite extreme because of struggle and debate, the so -called left.He praised the country to do well in this regard, and advocated that everyone must learn the central government's strategic determination in the current complex situation to prevent disturbances from being disturbed and the policy is biased.
This is very sincere, and it is more important than the previous Weibo mdash; mdash; he reminded all parties not to deviate from the original position in the struggle.However, there is a reality that it is also worthy of thinking that Hu, who has always been bravely argued with the rightist: Over the years, as the voice of liberals has been completely suppressed, there is no sound of the other end of the spectrum to maintain a certain balance. China's public opinion left has become inertia.Then, is the ultimate direction of extremes, is it more likely to change from a possibility to fact?
