Recently, Professor Cao Xuetao, an academician of the Chinese Academy of Engineering, has become the focus of media attention. Since November 14, Elisabeth Bik, an independent scientific adviser to Stanford University, is in Twitter.On the scientific discussion and review website Pubpeer, he posted questions about Cao Xuetao's laboratory papers.Subsequently, she and a netizen named Hoya Camphorifolia marked about 50 problematic papers on Pubpeer. I do n’t know how much research results of Academician Cao, President Cao, but about 50 papers have been accused of problems, which is surprising and even thriller. This morning, I saw President Cao, Academician Cao, and the official response to this matter. In short, it was four words: the wrong picture was put. Seeing this so -called official response is really enough to make people.If you occasionally have this statement in one or two papers, you can understand or believe that Mr. Cao's rhetoric, but more than a dozen articles, dozens of articles that have been accused by others, you still say that this is a wrong picture, it is the wrong picture, it is a wrong picture, it is a wrong picture, it is a picture of the wrong picture, it is a picture of the wrong picture.Is this to play with the public's IQ, or is it necessary to despise the rigor of scientific research and studies? We have too many reasons to say that you are a professor, an academician of a National Academy of Engineering, and the principal of a famous school. How can you be convincing? Not picky, let alone dozens of articles. You should not make an error in a paper because you represent an academic attitude and location. There are about 50 articles that are currently questioned.It has been spanning until 2019.In most articles, Cao Xuetao is a communication author.Communication authors often refer to the general person in charge of the subject, and the funding, design, and writing of the subject's funding, design, and articles are contacts of articles and research materials.Of course, communication authors are also responsible for ensuring the reliability of the article. Therefore, no matter how Academician Cao, Professor Cao, and President Cao explained, the pots of major flaws in your dozens of papers cannot be thrown to others. Two questions are placed here: 1. In different experiments or different indicators, the results of the results occur are too similar, and they are questioned repeatedly as the same picture. 2. Quote the picture has a trace of suspected changes. The problem discovery, Elizabeth Bike is an independent scientific consultant. She has worked for 15 years at Stanford University School of Medicine. She has professional knowledge in the research and academic non -active behavior of microorganisms.EssenceBick also said in his own Twitter: I have not accused anyone of academics; please keep in mind that many small problems may be just an honest error. How ridiculous to put the wrong picture.More than fifty articles have been put wrong. Is it unwilling to do it? If our high -end personnel do this academic research, this study is desperate and disappointed.Data and achievements must be true and rigorous. This is the most basic academic attitude. Even the most basic one is not necessary. Which scientific research do you do?How can you inherit the name of the famous academician school of the Academy of Engineering? Not long ago, people were faked and faked in the dissertation of an actor Zhai Tianlin, and they all discussed everywhere. So what should I do in the face of Mr. Cao Xuetao's behavior?Zhai Tianlin's breaking the sky is an acting, but Mr. Cao is an uncompromising expert and scholar. When responding to the incident, Academician Cao wrote to Dr. Elishaba Bika, said: There are no excuses for any mistakes in the supervision of scientific research results and laboratory leaders.The concerns you put forward once again reminded me that as a mentor, supervisor, and laboratory leader, my role and responsibility are so important, and I may not do it in these aspects.Therefore, my mood is very heavy, and I am very sorry for my current and previous students, employees, colleagues and colleagues, and a wider range of academic circles.I apologize for any negligence in my work and the inconvenience that may bring.I will consider this as a valuable learning opportunity. In the future, we will not only be committed to promoting scientific development, but also make greater contributions to the accuracy and integrity of guarding science. It is hoped that Academician Cao and his team can really achieve the accuracy and integrity of the science. As a professor, a doctoral supervisor, an academician of the Chinese Academy of Engineering.Academician of the National Academy of Medical Sciences, academician of the German Academy of Sciences.He is currently the deputy director of the 13th National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference, Mr. Cao, and his team of Mr. Cao and his team of the president of Nankai University.Essence However, on the road of studies, can it be true and rigorous on the road of scientific research. Suddenly this is a problem?Intersection Because there is an old man, he has said this: The problem of knowledge is a scientific problem. No him! Author: San San people 0 (Published by Kaidi)