Recently, a ridiculous past of Zhou Pingjun, the former deputy department of the Hubei Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection, was circulated on the Internet. It is reported that Zhou Pingjun was derailed during the marriage. In order to cover up people's eyes, he made his nephew and his lover fake marriage and dressed as husband and wife.On June 23, a reporter from Beiqing Daily searched for the relevant legal documents of the referee document network found that Zhou Pingjun, the former deputy department of the Hubei Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection, derailed children in the wedding in the wedding, and held a wedding for the lover and nephew for covering people's eyes;Zhou Pingjun was sentenced to eight years in prison for the crime of committing heavy marriage and bribery.

Zhou Pingjun, the former deputy department of Hubei Province, was accused of letting her nephew and her lover get married and was prosecuted for bribery and was married.

Recently, a period of ridiculous past of Zhou Pingjun, the former deputy department of the Hubei Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection, was circulated on the Internet. It is reported that in 2008, Zhou Pingjun's lover was unmarried first, but Zhou Pingjun had not yet divorced.In order to cover up people's eyes, Zhou Pingjun asked his nephew and his lover to marry a couple.

On June 23, a reporter from the Beijing Youth Daily search for the referee document network found that Zhou Pingjun was guilty of bribery and the criminal judgment of the second instance of the crime of getting married.The Deputy Discipline Inspection Supervisor of the Inspection Team of the Commission and the deputy disciplinary inspector of the disciplinary classroom of the Hubei Provincial Discipline Inspection Commission.He was criminally detained on April 15, 2015 for suspected offending bribery and a crime of marriage, and was arrested on the 29th of the same month.

The court of first instance believes that the defendant Zhou Pingjun, as a national staff, uses the convenience of his position to seek benefits for others, accept and obtain bribes many times, and the amount is particularly huge.Life in nominals, its behavior has constituted a crime of bribery and a crime of getting married.The defendant Zhou Pingjun committed several crimes and committed several crimes and punished according to law.The defendant Zhou Pingjun accepted bribes many times and had bribes.

According to relevant laws and regulations, the court of first instance judged the defendant Zhou Pingjun for bribery, sentenced to 10 years in prison, and confiscated the property of RMB 200,000;It also confiscated the property of RMB 200,000. It was collected by the seized Audi A6 car, a LV bag, a LV scarf, and a golden Buddha pendant, and recovered more than 300,000 yuan in bribe.

Zhou Pingjun has filed a appeal to deny that he has bribed and got married

Subsequently, the defendant Zhou Pingjun appealed: The original judgment determined that he received the fact that he received the facts of the Audi car worth 510,000 yuan in the Audi car. Luo Moujia has always claimed that the Audi car's property rights or creditor's rightsThe repayment of 254169.10 yuan housing mortgage loan is because it has a debt relationship with Wang Moujia and is not bribery; Dong gives his golden Buddha pendant to the monks and gifts between students and friends, not bribery, and the value of the golden Buddha pendant lacks the lack of the value of the gold Buddha pendant.The judicial appraisal confirmed that it should not be determined; the original judgment determined that Mao gave it to a packet worth 21,500 yuan and a silk scarf of 6,450 yuan, and Luo Moujia gave his children a red envelope of 20,000 yuan.The original judgment determined that it received 20,000 yuan in Luo Moujia and the furniture worth 8,120 yuan was improper.

Zhou Pingjun believes that investigators investigating and evidence collection procedures are seriously illegal. During the survey investigation, non -judicial organs and non -judicial personnel have evidenced by evidence.Parent -child appraisal, the procedure is seriously illegal; during the period of the marriage relationship with the first wife Zhang Mi, he did not live together with the name of the husband and wife, and did not constitute a crime of getting married.

The second instance of the court determined that Zhou Pingjun was convicted of bribery and sentenced to 8 years in prison

According to the trial of the second instance of the Intermediate People's Court of Huangshi City, Hubei City, the original judgment determined that the original trial defendant Zhou Pingjun was clearly crime and the crime of acceptance of bribery, and the evidence was indeed and sufficient. The court confirmed.

Regarding the appellant Zhou Pingjun and his defender proposed that Zhou Pingjun did not constitute the crime of marriage and defense opinions, the court found that according to witnesses, Ma Mou, Cui, Liu Moubing, Yan, etc.Certificate, divorce certificate and other documentary certificates and parent -child appraisal reports confirmed that Zhou Pingjun had a husband and wife and had children with a husband and wife during the termination of the marriage relationship with Zhang Mi without legal procedures.The relationship between Zhou Pingjun is in accordance with the relationship between Zhou Pingjun's behavior.Therefore, this opinion of the appellant and defender is not supported.

Regarding Zhou Pingjun and his defenders proposed the reason and defense opinions of the illegal appeal of the investigation procedure in this case, the court investigated that the cases involved in the case involved in the case of procuratorial organs in this case were obtained by investigators of procuratorial organs in accordance with the law.The appellant and the defender did not provide clues or evidence to confirm that the procuratorial organs adopted illegal methods such as violence and threats to collect witness testimony. Relevant witnesses testimony should be trial and proved by the trial and evidence.The appraisal opinions collected by the disciplinary inspection and supervision organs in the process of investigating and handling the case, after review by the People's Procuratorate, believed that the appraisal agency has an appraisal qualification, the appraiser has an appraisal qualification, the appraisal procedure is legal, the appraisal conclusion can be used as evidence.The appraisal opinion passed the trial and certificate, and the court accepted the letter according to law.Therefore, this opinion on the appellant and defender is not supported.

In the end, the court of second instance believed that the original judgment was determined that the facts were clear, the evidence was true, full, qualitative and accurate, and the trial procedure was legal.In view of the changes in the law, Zhou Pingjun was sentenced to a part of the conviction of bribery in accordance with the law.Judgment in accordance with relevant laws and regulations: Maintain the criminal judgment of the defendant Zhou Pingjun in the Yangxin County People's Court of Hubei Province (2015) Eyang Xinxin Chu Zi No. 00363;Yang Xinxin Chu Zi No. 00363 criminal judgment to the torture part of the defendant Zhou Pingjun; the appellant (the defendant of the original trial) Zhou Pingjun was convicted of bribery, sentenced to seven years in prison, and confiscated the property of RMB 200,000;It was sentenced to one year and six months in prison, decided to execute eight years in prison, and confiscated the property of RMB 200,000.

Since then, Zhou Pingjun has filed a complaint, but was rejected.(Beijing Youth Daily reporter Dai Youqing Li Tao)