Sino -US anchor Vietnam Ocean debate trade war Liu Xin has received praise from the an

1/1 Liu Xin

When the Sino -US trade war heated up, Liu Xin, the female anchor of China International Television (CGTN), and the "Vietnamese Debate" of Trish Regan, the female anchor of Fox Business, was held as scheduled yesterday.Compared with the tough posture of the two, this confrontation was carried out in a polite and friendly atmosphere. In just 16 minutes, the two confronted related topics such as intellectual property protection.CCTV News Broadcast describes the "TV Dialogue" of China -US anchors. The Chinese official media reported the debate yesterday from the perspective of the "Return of the Glory", calling it a classic case of Chinese external communication.Singaporean scholar Wang Jiangyu believes that Liu Xin answered "the well -being and decent." The "TV debate" was broadcast at 8:30 pm on Thursday, US time (Hong Kong time yesterday at 830).Liu Xin appeared in the golden time program of Ligan in the cgTN Beijing anchor through satellite connection.This is the first time that the anchor of China and the United States has confronted them in English.The two sides dialogue on fair trade, intellectual property, Huawei, tariffs, and the status of developing countries in China. However, the content is closer to Ligan asked and a connection conversation that Liu Xin answered, and there is no fierce spark. At the beginning of Tanfu, when Ran Gan introduced Liu Xin, "My guest is part of the Communist Party of China," which caused Liu Xin to immediately clarify that he was not a member of the Communist Party of China. "I don't speak for the CCP.Let the dialogue add a tense atmosphere. Ligan first questioned the quality of intellectual property rights and technical transfer. There was evidence that China had stole huge value of intellectual property to the United States. How should American companies operate in China?Liu Xin did not respond positively, but only said that it would ask American companies if she was willing to go to China and whether they made money with Chinese companies.She said that it does not deny that China has the current theft of intellectual property or even discussing confidential theft cases. This is indeed a problem that needs to be solved.However, she also shows that the above behavior is "universal behavior" around the world, and American companies often sue interact with intellectual property issues. Ligan then mentioned that Huawei, a Chinese technology giant recently blocked by the United States, said that if the United States allows Huawei to enter its market, but the conditions must be shared by the technology they developed, can they be accepted?Liu Xin responded that if it was through cooperation and mutual learning and paid for scientific and technological intellectual property rights, the above approach was fine.In response to Ligan's idea of "completely canceling the existing tariffs between the two parties", Liu Xin said that this is a very good idea, but to change the rules, it is necessary to implement it through the multilateral decision -making process. In the summary of Ligan, he is a supporter of free trade and also believes that it is necessary to continue to be open, which will bring economic prosperity to China and the United States.Liu Xin finally told Ligan that if she wanted to continue to discuss, welcome to China, "I will take you around." After the conversation, Ligan asked American eagle scholar Michael Pillsbury to comment on the spot. He said that Liu Xin performed elegant and kindly, but this was also the US President Trump and the US trade negotiating team in the past year.The right question: China is very good at performance. The two sides initially reached a good agreement, but the Chinese side later retreated, and the negotiations were in a deadlock. The debate was rising to the "Sino -US duel height" in the Mainland, and mainland netizens were cheering up.The official media also reported from the perspective of the "Return of the Roster" that the WeChat public name Niu played the piano, and Liu Xin's argument became a classic case of China's external communication.Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Lu Kang said that this should not be a debate, but a dialogue between the two hosts.He said that China encouraged people to see some rational thinking and dialogues from all walks of life in China and the United States. Wang Jiangyu, an associate professor at the National University of Singapore, said that on the trade war and other issues, Liu Xin answered that it was very decent and made full use of this stage to publicize it, but in the face of Ligan's accusation of Chinese stolen intellectual property rightsEssence