The team of lawyers of Huawei Chief Financial Officer Meng Wanzhou entered the Canadian court, which said that the Canadian government arrested Meng Wanzhou and violated the country's charter and infringed its rights.According to the analysis of scholars interviewees, the above -mentioned prosecution aims to safeguard Meng Wanzhou's legitimate rights and interests, which is a normal practice in the West.
On the other hand, the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Lu Kan urged the United States to immediately revoke the arrest warrant and extradition request for Meng Wanzhou at a regular press conference yesterday.And effectively protect its legitimate legitimate rights and interests, and avoid mistakes.
Meng Wanzhou's lawyer team filed civil lawsuits on the Canadian Border Affairs Bureau (CBSA), Royal Canadian Madrid and the federal government at the Supreme Court of British Columbia last Friday (1st).
According to the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) on the 3rd, Meng Wanzhou's team accused CBSA officials and royal police police officers deliberately and premeditated from Meng Wanzhou to obtain evidence from Meng Wanzhou, which seriously violated her constitutional rights.
The Canadian side was also accused. Although there was an immediately arrest of Meng Wanzhou's arrest, she pretended to be delayed as a routine border inspection when she passed her in Vancouver. The purpose was to draw evidence from her.
Attorney Meng Wanzhou also revealed that she was detained by the authorities for three hours without explaining and notifying the lawyer, making her feel stressful, anxiety and deprivation of freedom.As a result, Misfeasance in Public Office and False IMPRISONMENME was sued for the Canadian government for compensation.
According to the 13 -page prosecution quoted by the CBC, CBSA officials were accused of illegally accepting two private phones after arresting Meng Wanzhou, one Apple iPad tablet and a laptop.After officials took these items into the office, they asked Meng Wanzhou to hand over the password, and illegally opened and visited the content of the tour. At the same time, they also searched their luggage to violate their privacy.
CBSA, Royal Madrid and the Federal Government have not yet responded to the above allegations.Huawei only said in response yesterday that it is not currently not commentary.
Wang Jiangyu, an associate professor at the National University of Law of Singapore, pointed out in an interview with Lianhe Morning Post yesterday that Meng Wanzhou and his lawyer groups mainly want to complain to reflect that the Canadian government has many irregularities and unlicensed behaviors in the process of arresting her, and will and will be will be.They point out.
He said: Actually, there are many things such in the West. If your police and the government have any irregular behavior, then I go to prosecution is a normal performance of preserving their rights.
Wang Jiangyu pointed out that Canada claims to protect human rights very well, but does not give the parties a timely notice. At the beginning, he used normal customs inspections as an excuse to try to lure Meng Wanzhou and seduce her some information. These are not all these are notIn line with some legitimate program principles.
As for whether the Canadian government is really suspected of illegal, Wang Jiangyu said that this still has to be judged by the court.He also pointed out that Meng Wanzhou's move should not be particularly directly related to the Sino -US trade war.
On the same day of the lawyer of Meng Wanzhou's lawyer, the Canadian Ministry of Justice approved the extradition procedure to promote Meng Wanzhou, which caused strong protests in Chinese officials.
On the way to Mexico on December 1st last year, Meng Wanzhou was arrested under the Micharic extradition treaty while he was transferred in Canada. He is currently bail, but he must not leave Vancouver.The U.S. Department of Justice had sued Meng Wanzhou at the end of January and officially put forward her demand for extradition to her trial.
Meng Wanzhou is expected to appear in court at a hearing in a local time (6th), at that time, it will be determined that the date of extradition hearing will be determined.
Huawei is preparing to prosecute the US government
According to media such as the New York Times and the British Reuters yesterday, Huawei also prepared to sue the U.S. government in a clause in a clause passed by the US Congress and signed by the White House last year and was signed by the White House.The reason for the lawsuit proposed in the court is to believe that the US government's approach to Huawei constitutes a situation of deprivation of the public rights bill, that is, the terms in the bill constitute an obvious unruly first judgment to Huawei, and the US Constitution prohibits the U.S. Congress from the US Constitution.Through such laws.
