On February 27, the Chinese ambassador to Canada, Lu Shaye, published an article in the U.S. Congress Mountain News, and asked Western countries such as the United States to claim that Huawei's equipment was questioned by national security.Lu Shayan believes that the United States ’s international manufacturing and hype on Huawei equipment security issues actually advertised Huawei, so that the people of the world know that Huawei is the best in the field of 5G technology.

In addition, Lushaye also said that the real reason for the United States to crowd out Huawei is not in the threat of national security, but attempts to suppress American companies competitors through political intervention.The construction of a 5G network for Huawei may not help the national security of the country.

For a period of time, the remarks about Huawei's equipment have threatened the security of Western countries, but Huawei has rejected the so -called allegations.

Regarding the United States to lobby his allies and deliberately suppressing Huawei's behavior. In the middle of last month, he accepted an exclusive interview with the Broadcasting Corporation (BBC), Huawei founder and CEO Ren Zhengfei once felt that this was a good thing.

He said that the United States is the most powerful country in the world. Senior officials in the United States talk about Huawei all over the world. This is a cheap advertisement for Huawei.Essence

Subsequently on February 21, in an interview with 18 Canadian media in Toronto, Liang Hua, the chairman of Huawei, was interviewed in Toronto. According to the state of damage to Huawei's reputation due to the hype of Western countries, he said that I think this has no negative impact on our company's reputation.This is actually a free advertisement for Huawei.Now that the world knows that the United States is calling on its allies to suppress and crowd out Huawei.Everyone in the world knows Huawei, and such a powerful country in the United States is very concerned about Huawei.

On February 27, Ambassador Luson published a signature article entitled about Huawei's equipment in the Canadian Parliament Times in the Canadian Congress Times.The full text is as follows:

For a period of time, the remarks about Huawei's equipment have threatened Western security.The United States first announced that Huawei equipment was excluded from the 5G market.Among the five -eye alliance country, Australia and New Zealand followed up, and Canada and Britain have not made decisions.Some time ago, senior US officials also went to Europe to lobby, asking European allies, including Eastern European countries, did not use Huawei equipment.

The international manufacturing and hype of the United States related to Huawei equipment safety issues have produced the following effects:

First, it made an advertisement to Huawei so that the people of the world know that Huawei is the best in the field of 5G technology.At present, the world's 5G network construction is in the ascendant. Except for Huawei, Ericsson, Nokia, and Cisco are all leaders in the industry.Because the United States has repeatedly rendered Huawei 5G technology, there are hidden safety hazards, so that countries around the world, especially online operators, cannot help but further pay attention to their respective 5G construction prospects.From media reports, in terms of 5G technology, Huawei's leading competitors have obvious advantages.Telecom operators in some countries said that if Huawei 5G equipment is excluded, the national 5G construction will be postponed by 1 to 2 years.There are also experts admitting that only Huawei equipment that can really be called 5G currently can be called 5G.The person in charge of Huawei also stated publicly that the current 5G equipment contract signed by the company is far ahead of other equipment manufacturers, and the uniqueness of Huawei technology is to combine 5G and microwave technology.of.All ordinary people did not understand it. After the rendering of the United States, it was well known to the world.

Second, the real reason for the United States to crowd out Huawei is not in the threat of national security, but attempts to suppress American company competitors through political intervention.Although the five -eye alliance intelligence agency led by the United States has repeatedly declared that Huawei's equipment has pose a threat to relevant national security, but it has never been evidenced by now.They accused Huawei of close relations with the Chinese government and conducting espionage for Chinese officials. One of the reasons is that the Chinese National Intelligence Law requirement agencies and individuals to cooperate with national intelligence work.For this, both the Chinese government and Huawei have clarified.A few days ago, the person in charge of the former British Intelligence Institution Communication Headquarters published a public development document saying that it has never been found that the Chinese government has been found to have carried out evidence of malicious network activities through Huawei.Maintaining national security in the form of legislation is an international practice. US law requires telecommunications operators to have the obligation to cooperate with government intelligence agencies.Five -eye alliance countries, France, Germany and other Western countries have similar legal regulations.The formulation of the Chinese National Intelligence Law is exactly the relevant legal provisions of these Western countries.In fact, it is those countries that accuse the Chinese government of using Huawei equipment to engage in spy activities to use telecommunications companies to engage in spy activities.I believe readers will not forget the prism program disclosed a few years ago.It can be seen that the American intelligence departments such as the United States and other national intelligence departments were not due to the so -called national security threat, but to crowd out Huawei and create unfair competition conditions for the country's telecommunications equipment companies.

Third, the construction of a 5G network will not help the national security of the country.Huawei equipment does not pose a threat to national security. Instead, it will cause inconvenience to some national intelligence agencies to monitor and listen to large -scale monitoring and listening in the world's citizens and countries around the world.Judging from the disclosure of the prism door incident, the United States conducts large -scale monitoring and monitoring of its citizens and allies, relying on the telecommunications network of the country.The reason why the United States and other countries are so afraid of Huawei equipment is a reasonable explanation that if the relevant countries in the 5G era have used Huawei devices, the monitoring systems that these intelligence agencies spend huge sums of money will become deaf and blind, and they willIt takes more effort to break through the safety setting of Huawei equipment, and it is more difficult to operate.Huawei has promised to increase capital investment and further improve equipment security.This is unwilling to see Western intelligence agencies such as the United States.

The good news is that in the past two days, the country's attitude towards Huawei has changed a positive change, saying that it will not exclude Huawei equipment.This is the right choice.After all, 5G technology is not exclusive to one or more countries, but the product of exchanges and cooperation between countries.Blocking Huawei may mean missing the development of express cars in the 5G era.