Liu Qiangdong's alleged sexual assault case is currently in a deadlock between the two sides.(AFP)

(Minneapolis/New York Comprehensive News) American media revealed the latest developments in the sexual assault case of JD.com founder Liu Qiangdong. Local prosecutors are weighing evidence to break the deadlock between the two sides.

Among the issues being considered by the U.S. Attorney's Office in Hennepin County, the U.S. Attorney's Office included disagreements over what happened that night, the police's initial verdict of no crime and the girl's initial hesitation to charge Liu, according to Reuters..

Florin, the girl's lawyer, said that the case was simple, and Liu Qiangdong forcibly had sex without consent.While girls are understandably hesitant to press charges at first, no one fully understands the initial emotional turmoil of a rape victim.

Some legal experts said the victims' initial hesitation may have deterred prosecutors from indicting, citing concerns about what a jury would think.Kanav, a former sex crimes prosecutor in New York, said: Unfortunately, the decision to prosecute has a lot to do with the victim's initial reaction.

Other experts said prosecutors should still be able to press charges.Andreo, a Pennsylvania attorney who often represents sexual assault cases, said: Prosecutors can still convince jurors that the victim's initial hesitation is due to fear of retaliation, avoidance and shame.

According to the victim's recorded statement, after the sexual assault, Liu Qiangdong's personal assistant tried to reach a settlement with the girl through an intermediary.The day after the incident, Liu Qiangdong's other assistant contacted the victim and hoped to have a talk.

The two parties finally agreed to meet at the Carlson School of Management at the University of Minnesota at 10:30 p.m. on August 31.But when Liu Qiangdong arrived, the girl had already called the police.The police arrested Liu Qiangdong at 11 p.m. that day.

Liu Qiangdong's lawyer, Brisbos, replied that once more evidence is disclosed, Liu Qiangdong's innocence will be obvious.We are very disappointed that Reuters is willing to use unsubstantiated information provided by anonymous sources with obvious intentions to report, while Liu Qiangdong is hindered by the judicial process and cannot defend himself.

Liu Qiangdong did not respond to the sexual assault incident in a conference call after JD.com announced its earnings this week.