Wu Wenkang, former secretary of Bo Xilai, former deputy secretary-general of the Chongqing Municipal Party Committee, and former director of the General Office of the Chongqing Municipal Party Committee, has been sentenced to confiscation of all personal property.Recently, Wu Wenkang's confiscation of all personal property notice issued by China Judgment Documents Network disclosed this news.

The notice of closing the case states that the Changchun Intermediate Court of Jilin Province, in the case of confiscating all personal property of the person subject to execution Wu Wenkang, has reviewed: during the review by the Central Disciplinary Inspection Commission and the trial of the criminal case, the property of the person subject to execution Wu Wenkang and his relatives and friends were seized and turned over.20,206,644.36 yuan in total, of which 20,203,348 yuan was confiscated according to law, and the remaining 3,296.36 yuan was confiscated.

Additional investigation: Wu Wenkang, the person subject to execution, has no other personal property under his name. In accordance with the provisions of Article 108 (1) of the Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Execution Work of the People's Courts (for Trial Implementation), the notification is as follows: Changchun City, Jilin Province IntermediateThe People's Court (2013) Chang Xing Er Chu Zi No. 38 Criminal Judgment has been fully implemented, and the case has been closed.

When Wu Wenkang cooperated with the Central Work Office to investigate the Wang Lijun incident, he reported and exposed the criminal facts of Bo Xilai's abuse of power.In March 2015, Wu Wenkang was sentenced to life imprisonment by the Jilin Provincial Higher Court for accepting bribes, deprived of political rights for life, and confiscated all personal property; the seized cash of RMB 20,203,348 was confiscated in accordance with the law and turned over to the state treasury, and the rest as the defendantWu Wenkang's personal property shall be confiscated.

The above notice of closing the case shows that nearly four years after Wu Wenkang was sentenced, he confiscated all his personal property and was able to complete the execution.

Wu Wenkang was born in Dalian City, Liaoning Province in July 1958. He served as secretary of the Dalian Municipal Government, assistant to the director of the Dalian Port Committee, deputy director of the General Office of the Liaoning Provincial Government, deputy secretary-general of the Chongqing Municipal Committee, and director of the General Office.Secretary Xilai.In January 2016, China Judgment Documents Network published the second-instance criminal ruling of Wu Wenkang for accepting bribes.

According to the ruling, in November 2014, the Intermediate People's Court of Changchun City, Jilin Province ruled that from 1999 to 2012, Wu Wenkang used his positions as secretary of the Dalian Municipal Government, assistant to the director of the Dalian Port Committee, and deputy director of the General Office of the Liaoning Provincial Government.The deputy secretary-general of the Chongqing Municipal Committee of the Communist Party of China, the director of the general office, etc., provided assistance to others in land development projects, contracting projects, and commercial loans.The properties given by XX, Fan Mojia, Chairman of Dalian Yicheng Housing Development Company, Fan Mouyi, Chairman of Dalian Jinguang Construction Group Co., Ltd., and Fu Moumou, Chairman of Dalian Zhengyuan Real Estate Development Co., Ltd., total equivalent to RMB2020.3348 million yuan.

The Changchun City Intermediate People's Court held that Wu Wenkang, as a state employee, took advantage of his position to illegally accept and extort property from others to seek benefits for others, and his behavior constituted the crime of accepting bribes.

In view of the fact that he took advantage of his position to provide assistance to Zhong XX in the approval of engineering projects and asked Zhong XX for a house, which was extortion of bribes and should be given a heavier punishment according to law; he had confessed circumstances and could be given a lighter punishment according to law;In other cases, if you can actively cooperate, confirm the relevant circumstances, and all the stolen money involved in the case has been handed over, you have shown remorse and may be given a lighter punishment as appropriate.

In November 2014, the Changchun City Intermediate People's Court sentenced Wu Wenkang to life imprisonment, deprived him of political rights for life, and confiscated all his personal property for accepting bribes.Wenkang's personal property shall be confiscated.

After the verdict was pronounced, Wu Wenkang refused to accept it and appealed.

Wu Wenkang and his defenders put forward three defense opinions, including that Wu Wenkang reported and exposed Bo Xilai's criminal facts of abusing his power when he cooperated with the special office of the Central Committee in the investigation of the Wang Lijun incident., with a surrender plot.

The High Court of Jilin Province found out after the trial that Wu Wenkang was found guilty of accepting bribes in the original judgment. The facts are clear and the evidence is indeed sufficient.

With regard to Wu Wenkang and his defender's appeal and defense opinions for reporting and exposing Bo Xilai's crimes of abusing his power, and his performance of meritorious service, after investigation, Wu Wenkang was cooperating with the Special Office of the Central Committee in the investigation of the Wang Lijun incident.It exposed Bo Xilai's criminal facts of abusing his power, rather than reporting and exposing him after he came to the case.

The Jilin Provincial Higher Court held that his behavior did not comply with the Supreme People's Court lsquo; Interpretation of Several Issues Concerning the Application of Laws in Handling Self-surrender and Meritorious Service rsquo; Article 5: According to the provisions of the first paragraph of Article 68 of the Criminal Law, the criminalLater, there is a provision for reporting and exposing other people's criminal behavior... After verification and verification, it should be deemed as having performed meritorious service.Therefore, the relevant appeal grounds and defense opinions are untenable and shall not be accepted.

With regard to Wu Wenkang's claim that he voluntarily confessed his crime of accepting bribes when he cooperated with the Central Work Office in the investigation of the Wang Lijun incident, the grounds for appeal and defense opinions that he had surrendered himself.

After investigation, according to the letter from the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection of the Communist Party of China, the Special Work Office of the Central Committee found that Wu Wenkang was suspected of accepting bribes during the investigation of the Wang Lijun incident and the review of the 11middot;15 case.The facts of the crime, his behavior does not constitute surrender.The High Court of Jilin Province also believed that the relevant appeal grounds and defense opinions were untenable and should not be adopted.

In the end, the three defense opinions put forward by Wu Wenkang and his defenders were all rejected by the High Court of Jilin Province.In March 2015, the court ruled to reject Wu Wenkang's appeal and uphold the original judgment.