On September 17, the Intermediate People's Court of Hulunbeier City, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region publicly announced the bribery case of Sun Huaishan, former member of the Standing Committee of the 12th National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference and former director of the Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan and Overseas Chinese Committee.A fine of 3 million yuan was also imposed; the property and fruits obtained by Sun Huaishan from accepting bribes were recovered and turned over to the state treasury.
The court found through trial that: from 1994 to 2016, the defendant Sun Huaishan took advantage of his position to serve Jiangsheng Company and other units andIndividuals seek interests in matters such as obtaining land use rights and undertaking personal art exhibitions;
Taking advantage of the convenient conditions formed by his authority and status, and through the behavior of staff of other countries in their positions, he seeks unreasonable benefits for Tianjin Goldman Sachs, Longyuan International Investment and Development Co., Ltd. and other units and individuals in matters such as business operation, project approval, and job promotion.legitimate interest.
From 2000 to 2016, the defendant, Sun Huaishan, directly or through his wife, his son, and daughter-in-law, received cash, gold bars, calligraphy and painting works, and received salary in name, and illegally received money from the person in charge of the above-mentioned units and individuals many times.Property, totaling more than RMB 39.75 million.
After the incident, the defendant Sun Huaishan voluntarily confessed that the case-handling agency did not yet have some facts about the crime of accepting bribes, and all the stolen money and goods had been recovered.
The Hulunbuir Intermediate People's Court held that the defendant Sun Huaishan's actions constituted the crime of accepting bribes.After the incident, Sun Huaishan truthfully confessed the criminal facts that the case-handling agency had already grasped, and voluntarily confessed some criminal facts that the investigation agency had not yet grasped, which was a confession; he actively returned the stolen money and goods, pleaded guilty and repented.The above judgment was then made.(End)
