Want to be promoted, take money, want to keep your position, take money, but the amount of money is not up to standard?Nothing!When Huang Chun, the former deputy county magistrate and director of the Public Security Bureau of Anxiang County, Hunan Province, was in office, he set up a business model of selling officials. The 11 middle-level backbones of the county bureau did their best to raise money to buy officials.Set up a small treasury and bribe them wantonly.

At the end of 2016, after Huang Chun was investigated, his selling of officials caused a bad political environment in the local public security system, and he became a typical example of anti-corruption notifications many times.

According to the verdict recently released by China Judgment Documents Network, Huang Chun, the protagonist of selling officials, was found guilty of accepting bribes by the Dingcheng District Court of Changde City, Hunan Province on July 18, 2018. He was sentenced to 3 years and 6 months in prison and fined RMB300,000 yuan.

Through two projects, nearly one million has been collected

Huang Chun, born in 1959, is a senior police officer. He successively served as the director of the security department of Changde City Public Security Bureau, deputy department-level investigator, director of Shimen County Public Security Bureau, director of Li County Public Security Bureau, deputy county head of Anxiang County People's Government,Director of the Public Security Bureau.Early retirement in September 2015.

According to the verdict, Huang Chun was found to have accepted bribes of 1.48 million yuan, 32,000 Hong Kong dollars, and 18,000 U.S. dollars from 2010 to September 2015.One of the major sources of income is to borrow bribes from the contractors for the construction projects of the Public Security Bureau.

In 2013, Anxiang County Public Security Bureau launched two construction projects, one is the business technology building of the County Public Security Bureau, and the other is the two-in-one (detention center and detention center) project. Huang Chun borrowed these two projects and obtained nearlyA million dollar bribe.

On April 9, 2013, the Anxiang County Public Security Bureau issued an online bidding announcement for the business technology building. Ding, the chairman of Hunan Xinxia Construction Engineering Co., Ltd., went to Huang Chun's dormitory in early August 2013 to deliver the project to the contractor.RMB 300,000.At the end of the month, Huang Chun's daughter got married, and Ding gave another RMB 100,000.In the following month, Ding won the bid, and later he intended to undertake the decoration project of the business technology room, and gave Huang Chun 260,000 yuan and 10,000 U.S. dollars successively.

In the second half of 2013, the two-in-one project of the Anxiang County Public Security Bureau began to invite bids. Qu, the general manager of the Zhongshan Branch of Guangzhou Huangpu Construction Engineering Corporation, donated 200,000 yuan in Huangchun's office to undertake the project.On March 12, 2014, the bidding for the two-institution-in-one project was opened, and Qu won the bid. After that, he gave another 32,000 Hong Kong dollars to Huang Chun.

Another way of making money: selling officials

Huang's other income is to make money through personnel adjustments, and he is known as the director of selling officials.

The China Disciplinary Inspection and Supervision Daily once reported that Huang Chun had served as the director of the Public Security Bureau for 12 years in the three counties of Shimen, Lixian, and Anxiang.There is such an unspoken rule: if you want to be promoted and reused, you must send a certain amount of money and things to Huang Chun.However, the unspoken rules of selling an official show three characteristics: want to promote, take money, want to keep the position, take money, the amount of money is not up to standard, there is no way.What's more serious is that due to Huang Chun's clear price tag, the 11 middle-level backbones of the Anxiang County Public Security Bureau did their best to raise money to buy officials.local political ecology.

The verdict found that 10 middle-level cadres from the Anxiang County Public Security Bureau gave Huang a total of 628,000 yuan in seeking to be transferred or looked after, with an average of more than 60,000 yuan per person. The most was 290,000 yuan for one person.The 10 middle-level cadres have positions such as team leader, deputy team leader, police station director, and trainer.

Jiang, who gave the most, was formerly the captain of a brigade of the County Public Security Bureau. Before the Spring Festival in 2013, Jiang gave 50,000 yuan to Huang Chun in the dormitory of the fire brigade, asking Huang Chun to help him transfer jobs.On February 29, 2013, during the personnel adjustment of the Anxiang County Public Security Bureau, Jiang, with the help of Huang Chun, was transferred from the team leader to the Shenliu Police Station as the director.Since then, in order to thank Huang Chun for his help and hope to continue to get his care to avoid being transferred, Jiang gave Huang Chun 240,000 yuan six times from before the Dragon Boat Festival in 2013 to before the Spring Festival in 2015.

The verdict shows that in 2013, Feng Mou, then director of the Tangjiapu Police Station of the Anxiang County Public Security Bureau, repeatedly asked Huang Chun to be transferred to the Criminal Investigation Brigade as the team leader, but Huang Chun did not give a clear answer.At the beginning of the first month of 2014, in order to ensure that he could be transferred to the criminal investigation brigade during the personnel adjustment at the beginning of the year, Feng went to Huang Chun's hometown to pay New Year's greetings and sent RMB 40,000.Three months later, with the help of Huang Chun, Feng Mou was transferred to the Criminal Investigation Brigade as the captain.

In addition to the above-mentioned 10 middle-level cadres who were found to have bribed Huang Chun, the court also found out that in order to get Huang Chun’s care and attention, Zhou, a policeman from the Anxiang County Public Security Bureau, gave Huang Chun seven times in the name of New Year’s greetings, totaling 3.3 yuan.However, because Zhou did not make a specific entrustment and did not seek benefits for others, the court did not recognize Huang Chun as a crime of accepting bribes.

Being investigated and busy returning stolen goods, local warning education

Although Huang Chun retired early in September 2015, the organization had already received a report and started investigating him.

The verdict shows that in May 2015, the Tenth Inspection Team of the Hunan Provincial Party Committee transferred clues to Huang Chun's suspected violation of discipline to the Changde Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection.The Changde Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection also received a report on Huang Chun's violation of discipline.On December 7, 2016, the Changde Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection filed a case against Huang Chun for review.On January 20, 2017, Huang Chun was expelled from the party, dismissed from public office, and transferred to the judiciary for handling.

Zhang, who was then deputy secretary of the Anxiang County Party Committee and the county magistrate, testified that in April 2015, the inspection team of the Hunan Provincial Party Committee went to Anxiang County to conduct inspections and received feedback on Huang Chun's problems in three aspects. One is to lead the team and lead the teamThe requirements are not strict. The second is that the cadres are adjusted frequently and are profit-oriented. They recognize money but not people.

Afterwards, the main leaders of the county talked to Huang Chun respectively.Zhang had two talks with Huang Chun. The first talk was not very effective. In June 2015, he talked to Huang Chun for the second time.effective.

At that time, Tang, secretary of the Political and Legal Committee of Anxiang County, was entrusted by the main leaders of the county, and also had a talk with Huang Chun on behalf of the organization, and informed the provincial inspection team of the above three issues and the behavior of accepting gifts. Huang Chun heard meThat being said, there are still some emotions, which I am not very happy to accept.

In May 2015, after learning that the inspection team of the Provincial Party Committee was investigating him, Huang Chun began to return the stolen goods.The verdict shows that in June 2015, Huang Chun refunded RMB 250,000 to Ding and RMB 200,000 to Qu.In October 2016, 32,000 Hong Kong dollars was converted into RMB 30,000 and returned to Qu.

After the incident, Huang Chun's family returned 1.1 million yuan of stolen money to the investigation agency. On November 17, 2017, Huang Chun returned another 80,000 yuan of stolen money to the court.

On July 18, 2017, the Dingcheng District Court of Changde City found the defendant Huang Chun guilty of accepting bribes in the first instance, and sentenced him to 3 years and 6 months in prison and a fine of RMB 300,000; the illegal income returned to Huang Chun was RMB 1.18 millionYuan shall be confiscated and turned over to the state treasury.

According to the China Disciplinary Inspection and Supervision News, Huang Chun said in his analysis of himself: After a long time at the top, it is easy to be self-righteous.One is that the top leaders lack supervision, the other is that they don't like supervision, and the third is that there is indeed a lack of supervision.

After Huang Chun fell from the horse, on February 10, 2017, the Standing Committee of the Hunan Changde Municipal Party Committee heard a special report on the Huang Chun case. Wang Qun, Secretary of the Changde Municipal Party Committee, asked the public security system to take this as an opportunity to make in-depth rectification and use the case as a warning to educate.

Immediately afterwards, the Party Committee of the Changde City Public Security Bureau organized a special democratic life meeting, conducted a deep analysis of Huang Chun's serious violation of discipline, and launched criticism and self-criticism.In the city's public security organs, a major rectification of discipline and work style focusing on the construction of leading cadres' party style and clean government was carried out, focusing on accepting red envelopes and gift money, buying and selling officials, handling relationship cases, favor cases, and money casesProminent issues such as inaction, indiscriminate behavior, and acting as an umbrella for underworld forces, pornography, gambling, and drug-related places.