>>> Li Yanhong: The Chinese are not so sensitive to privacy issues and are willing to exchange convenience with privacy.(China News Agency)

The US Facebook company was exploded by as many as 50 million users last week. When international public opinion condemned and personal information protection, Li Yanhong, CEO of Chinese Internet giant Baidu, said at the China Development High -level Forum the day before yesterday.Many people are surprised.

Talking about the recent data privacy issues that have attracted much attention, Li Yanhong made such a statement: I think the Chinese can be more open and are not so sensitive to privacy issues. If they are willing to exchange convenience with privacy, they are willing in many cases, then weYou can do something with data.

But he added that Baidu must abide by certain principles. If the data will benefit users, and the other party is willing, Baidu will execute.

Li Yanhong's words said that a day after the facebook was leaked for a day.As an Internet company that collects big data, Baidu is very different in the use of user information, but it is also bright.In particular, compared with the privacy of Apple CEO Tim Cook in the same field, Li Yanhong's relaxed stance on personal privacy protection is like a set of Chinese models that operate big data, which is fun. And Baidu's core policy is also accused by many: such as the bidding ranking of the phoenix nest system, the medical bidding ranking causes the death of college students, the piracy of Baidu video and video, the pirated piracy of the mobile pages, the toll contract for the post bar, etc., all of them are bad business benefits directions.Essence

Therefore, Li Yanhong's words made many Chinese netizens sound harsh and caused a round of vomiting, but in all fairness, this privacy is convenient, which is not unreasonable.

I came to China this year, and I am particularly grateful in daily life. It is the efficient operation and seamless connection of takeaway, taxi, navigation, shopping and other functions on mobile phones.Although there is always a hint of hesitation before entering the personal information, I think that I can sit on a sofa and shake my feet and wait for dinner to come to the door. It seems that I don't have to think too much. I entered my personal information in 151.

In the face of the huge convenience of technology, personal privacy did depreciate.It is not difficult to imagine that when cash -free payment, face brushing, etc., technology that binds personal information is becoming more and more pervasive. As long as the convenience of users enjoy is greater than the cumbersome input of personal information, it is difficult for the general public to have much resistance.

The more critical issue is that in the relatively closed network space in China, how much is the user's choice?Taking the network search device as an example, even if Baidu is bored with the advertisement pushed by Baidu, what platforms can netizens find information through?

Take a step back, in China's special social management and control environment, when personal WeChat, Weibo and other communication and public opinion tools are in close supervision, general netizens are not surprised by personal disclosure.How much will persistence?

In fact, in the torrent of the rapid development of the Chinese Internet and the big data industry, BAT (Baidu, Alibaba, and Tencent) three major Internet giants almost comprehensively covered and penetrated the public life.Significant personal privacy protection sounds more and more like pseudo -propositions.

I believe that most people are happy to see the booming development of big data technology, and it is indeed as Li Yanhong said that he is willing to exchange personal privacy with a certain limit.But from the rebound of some Chinese netizens on Li Yanhong's privacy theory, there are at least two bottom lines.

First of all, users may not mind paying personal information to the enterprise, but who can be seen by this information still hopes to have control, rather than letting the information secretly transferred to countless third -party businesses for other purposes.

Secondly, users may not care about where companies know what they are, what they love, what they love to eat, and even what they have, but the premise is that the disclosure of this information is not exchanged for unnecessary harassment.At present, Chinese big data companies are most criticized by the people. It is not that the information and data are mastered by third parties.

Although China has implemented a network security law last year, the protection of personal information security is still lacking, and the privacy and collection of big data have not yet been clear. In this aspect, there is a way to go.

This is popular on the Internet: In the era of big data, everyone is running naked, which means that modern users are in front of the Internet giants. Personal information is naked and naked.Li Yanhong's theory of privacy may just tell the old truth that other companies cannot open up, but in an era of increasing privacy, who people show their right to see, or want to have a certain right to speak.Is it too much?