(Morning News) said the US Chamber of Commerce said that competitivenessIt is crucial to the future of the United States, including responding to Chinese challenges.The largest business lobbying group in the United States also warns that more and more government markets and regulatory interventions will stifle competitiveness.

The VOA reported that the American Chamber of Commerce President Suzanne Clark said in a "American Business Status" annual speech on Tuesday (January 11) that the commercial situation in the United States is competitive"Competitiveness is how we build our country, make it unparalleled, and promote it to continue to move forward."

Clark from market competition, talent competition, global leadership competition and conceptual competition four four four four four fourIn this regard, the importance of competition to the future and even the world in the United States.She said: "We all saw the shocking innovation ability in the competition of the development of coronary vaccines and therapeutic drugs. Who won? All humans."

Talking about the global leadership competitionAt the time of the problem, Clark said that from the perspective of the important indicator of trade, the United States is behind.

She said that when other economies, including China, are competing for a new trade agreement, the United States has nothing to do. At present, the administrative official has almost no matter to change the status quo.

She said that China is continuing to become a powerful business and strategic competitors. At the beginning of the new year, the regional comprehensive economic partnership agreement (RCEP) covered the entire East Asian region has come into effect, so that China can better better wayEntering the fastest growing market.

She said that the US challenge strategy for China used to establish a cross -Pacific partnership agreement (TPP), and 90 % of the draft related agreements was written by US negotiators, but later the United States laterIt actually exited, but China was trying to join.

Clark also said that China has now become the largest trading partners and sources of investment sources in many countries in Africa and Latin America. If the United States fails to reach a mutually beneficial trade agreement with these countries, the United States will lose these marketsThe supported exports and domestic employment in the United States, "Not to mention that the strategic alliance has been weakened."

She said: "There is no simple answer on the Chinese issue -we must be strong in the world.Competition. We must defend our values and security, resist unfair trade and regulatory practices. We must cooperate on key global issues such as sustainable and public health. We must be able to achieve these three points -we can be skillfullyThis will be one of the characteristics of the definition of US leadership in this era. "

But Clark said that in the global competition of American companies, all the US government has to do.China's competition also needs to help American companies in terms of competition and innovation in domestic taxation and regulatory policies.

She mentioned the shortage of labor in the United States in her speech.She called for increasing the number of legal immigrants in the United States, creating a permanent solution for the "Dream Chaser" problem brought into the United States during her childhood, solving the difficulties faced by the parents of the "dream chaser", and helping the personnel of the prisoner to enter the employment market.Essence

But she also warns that the government should not intervene and regulate, otherwise it will kill the company's competition and innovation ability.She criticized some policies issued by the Biden Government and Congress or being proposed, including adopting radical stances in corporate mergers and acquisitions, considering income tax on corporate income tax.

She said that the government should play the role of a promoter, rather than the role of the inhibitors. The government can set the conditions for successful enterprises, but it should let enterprises continue to achieve growth, promote innovation, create employment, promote promotionProsperity.

Clark said: "The government cannot do what the enterprise does. The government cannot risk the risks that enterprises can take. The government cannot operate at a speed of innovation.It can only be re -assigned. "

She said that if the government does not stop intervention, the US Chamber of Commerce will challenge the government's practices in Washington, states and courts.

Clark pointed out that these competitions are basically a dispute over the political and economic model, that is, the event of the model from top -down, central management, and national operations wins, or a model of free promotion.Essence