The Chinese ambassador to France, Lu Shaye, responded to the former Soviet Union's joining republic of the former Soviet Union's joining the Republic in international law.Whether there is freedom of speech in the open debate of the TV, the freedom of speech should be guaranteed.
The Chinese Embassy in France was announced on the official website on Saturday (June 3) that Lushaye was interviewed by the French media "legal perspective" (VU DU DROIT "on May 31.
Lushaye said that it was very unfairly interviewed by reporters from French LCI TV stations to challenge the argument."I was interviewed by TV, and the expression should not be restricted, not to mention that I am not a mess. This is just my personal point of view. If anyone disagrees, we can discuss it, and there is no need to attack me. On the second day of the interview,They found some so -called Chinese issues in the same program to criticize me and condemn me. This is very unknown, isn't it? They have violated the professional ethics of the news. "
Lu Shayan said: "We can discuss historical issues, discuss the disintegration of the Soviet Union, and discuss historical facts. One in the Soviet Constitution is about joining the Republic to withdraw from the Soviet Union, but there are other terms that Soviet sovereignty prefer to join the Republic of the Republic.Interest of historical research, isn't this good? "
He also said:" My personal opinion does not prevent the Chinese government from maintaining an official relationship with these former Soviet Unions.These countries that joined the Republic of the former Republic to establish diplomatic relations. What I said is not conflicting with China's official foreign policy. Some people have done a lot of questions. "
Lu Shayan also said:" I think the key to this theory is not the key to this theory.The right or wrong I said, but whether there is freedom of speech in the open debate of the TV, and the freedom of speech should be guaranteed. "
Lushaye will be broadcast on the program broadcast on LCI TV on April 21st., Answer questions about the Russian and Ukraine War. When talking about Crimea's ownership, Lushaye said, "This depends on how to look at the question ... This is not so simple."
LuShayan said that Crimea was from Russia at the beginning, and later the then Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev gave Crimea to Ukraine.
The host said that according to international law, Crimea belongs to Ukraine.In this regard, Lu Shayan responded that from the perspective of international law, even the former Soviet Union's joining republic has no effective position, because no international agreement can implement their sovereign state status.
Lu Shaye's saying has caused public opinion for discussion in Europe.The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs subsequently clarified, emphasizing that China respects the sovereign state status of the republics after the disintegration of the Soviet Union, and hints that the relevant remarks of Lushaye do not represent the position of the Chinese government.
The Chinese Embassy in France also emphasized that Lu Shaye's remarks belong to their personal position, not China's official policy declaration, and called on the outside world not to over -interpret it.
After that, Chinese President Xi Jinping talked with the Ukrainian President Zelei Sky on April 26 that China would send a special representative of Chinese government Eurasian affairs to Ukraine and other countries to visit countries and solve them in politics.The Ukraine crisis communicates in depth with all parties.
Lu Shaye said in an interview with the "legal perspective": "Ambassador Li Hui's visit to European countries is to introduce China's peace plan to promote European countries including Russia, Ukraine, France, Germany, Poland and other European countries.The crisis in the crisis conducts peace talks. These countries are key parties to resolve the Ukraine crisis. But not all countries accept China's peaceful proposition because the battlefield situation is not favorable.I don't want the war to end. "
