Lao Rongzhi, who was sentenced to death for intentional homicide, Wu Danhong, his defense lawyer Wu Danhong, was tried that the Jiangxi High Court referred to the case of violations and was investigated by the Beijing Lawyer Association.

According to the surging news report, the Beijing Lawyers Association related cases on Tuesday (April 25) on Tuesday (April 25) showed that the Jiangxi High Court reported to the Beijing Judicial Bureau that Wu Danhong had violated the regulations, referringDuring his tenure as a defender of Lao Rongzhi, he published a number of articles and comments through Weibo and WeChat public accounts. He was suspected of violating the case and also made improper remarks on the court in court.

Wu Dan responded on Tuesday evening that there was indeed a notice of receiving the case and would cooperate with the relevant investigation, but he did not make the news of the investigation public on the Internet.

Wu Danhong also said that he did not speculate on the case during his acting Lao Rongzhi case. Although he had pointed out the procedure problem of the case handling authority in court, he did not "slander".Essence

According to Chinese media reports, the staff of the Beijing Law Association said that the review of the complaint case is "internal" and is currently inconvenient to disclose the situation.According to the notice of the case, the Beijing Law Association asked Wu Danhong to provide written defense opinions within ten working days, and law firms should also provide materials and other materials.

Lao Rongzhi followed the then boyfriend Faye Ying from 1996 to 1999, and successively committed four abductions, robbery, and murderers in Nanchang, Wenzhou, Changzhou, and Hefei. A total of seven people were killed.Fa Zeng was sentenced to death in 1999. After nearly 20 years of fleeing, Lao Rongzhi was arrested in Xiamen, Fujian in December 2019.The first trial of the Nanchang Intermediate People's Court sentenced Lao Rongzhi to the crime of intentional homicide, robbery, and abduction, and was sentenced to death. Lao Rongzhi appealed in court.

The case opened in the second instance of the Higher People's Court of Jiangxi Province last August. Wu Danhong participated in the trial as a defender of Lao Rongzhi.Wu Danhong proposed that Lao Rongzhi had lacks sufficient objective evidence that Lao Rongzhi was intentional, and Lao Rongzhi was a criminal of the law.The court believes that these defense opinions are inconsistent with the facts of the founding.

In November of the same year, the Jiangxi High Court ruled that the appeal was rejected, the original judgment was maintained, and the death penalty of Lao Rongzhi was reported to the Supreme People's Court for approval.As of now, the review of the death penalty of Lao Rongzhi has not been announced.