Yang Danxu: Who is embarrassing to make Lu Shayes frustrated words?

The Chinese ambassador to France, known as the wolf diplomat, once again shocked the four stories, and was tartd in Europe.

In an interview broadcast on Friday (April 21), a French TV station, Luosha Ye, who was interviewed in French, was asked if Crimea was in Ukraine: this depends on how to look at this question.

Lushaya said that Crimea originally belonged to Russia and was the former Soviet leader Khrushchev gave Crimea to Ukraine.

Under the inquiry of the host, Lu Shayan also said that the former Soviet Union did not have an effective status of international law because there was no international agreement that they found their status as a sovereign state.

The remarks of Lushayo were almost reasonable when Russian President Putin invaded Ukraine, and immediately annoyed a lot of European countries.Ukraine and MDASH; MDASH; MDASH; Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, which also joined the Republic of the Soviet Union to join the Republic.The French Ministry of Foreign Affairs also shocked Lu Shaye's remarks, asked China to explain, and hoped that this was not a Chinese position.

About 80 European members issued an open letter in the French World Daily, calling on French Foreign Ministers to announce the as soon as possible as an unwelling figure, which is equivalent to pressureing France to make a guest order to the Chinese ambassador to this Chinese ambassador.

Lusha's remarks made Macron, who had just been questioned in the Western world because of the walking route in the West, in the Western world.After visiting China a long time ago, Macron emphasized that Europe should be strategically autonomous. It is bluntly that Europe should avoid being involved in the China -US conflict for Taiwan.

Recently, it is reported that Macron has instructed the presidential foreign affairs consultant Bona to work with Wang Yi, a member of the Political Bureau of the Communist Party of China and the director of the Central Foreign Affairs Office, to formulate a framework for Russia and Ukraine.Today, Lu Shaye's remarks make people doubt whether China can play the role of mediation in a competence, and also allowed Macron to fight for Beijing to help the Russian and Ukraine's diplomatic efforts.

What is even more embarrassing is Beijing.Losho's words made China, which worked hard to shape the neutral image on the Russian and Ukraine issues.

In the current political interviews of Western media, the host to take tricky and sharp questions is the norm.Lusha Ye's host Darius Rochebin this time is an experienced media person, and it is obviously prepared.Provocation means.How to deal with these questions and explain the national positions that he represents is not humble and rude.

Objectively speaking, being able to accept foreign media interviews without restrictions, and does not avoid sensitive issues, it is a big step for Chinese officials who have always been cautious and conservative.But from the response from Lusha on some key issues, it is really unsatisfactory.Not only did he anger the host many times in the interview, but also failed to explain China's position on key issues, and even missed.

On the first anniversary of the outbreak of the Russian and Ukraine War, Beijing proposed a Chinese position on political resolution of the Ukrainian crisis. The first one emphasized is to respect the sovereignty of various countries.Although the Ukrainian issue is not in the scope of the ambassador to France, a ambassador representing France, representing China's major European countries, has obviously conflicty with Chinese official policies on the Russian and Ukraine issues.Confusing.

In fact, it is not just the former Soviet Union. If you are my reason that you can use the status of the sovereignty state of the United Nations, many countries in the world will feel cool.

This turmoil even made some thoughtful people think: Does Lu Shaye only represent personal opinions?To what extent these remarks reflect the position that Beijing is more inclined to recognize under the table?After all, as a ambassador, in any speech in public, it is difficult to distinguish personal views and national positions.

After the situation was quickly fermented, the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs had to come out to extinguish the fire.Speaker Mao Ning Monday (April 24) clarified that the former Soviet Union was a federal country, and as a whole as a whole with international law.This does not deny that after the disintegration of the Soviet Union, the republics of the joining the Republic have a sovereign state.

According to the release of the press conference uploaded by the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Mao Ning emphasized twice at the press conference that her statement represents the official position of the Chinese government.The implication of words, the relevant remarks of Lu Shaye do not represent the Chinese government's position.

The Chinese Embassy in France also issued a statement on the official website on Monday, clarifying that the statement of Lu Shaye on the Ukrainian issue was not a policy statement, but a personal point of view and should not be over -interpreted.The statement also emphasized that China respects the sovereign state status of the republics after the disintegration of the Soviet Union.

The siege of European public opinion and the official cutting seats in China have also made Lushaye very embarrassing.After a clarification statement was issued in the Chinese Embassy in France, Bruno Tertrais, deputy director of the French Strategic Research Foundation, said ironically in English in Twitter that the statement was pushed to the bus, which means that he sacrificed to sacrificeEssenceHowever, if the remarks of diplomats are contrary to national foreign policy, Beijing can only quickly stop bleeding.

This senior diplomat has actually caused controversy over once.In recent years, Chinese diplomacy has emphasized that we must dare to struggle when dealing with Western countries and be good at struggle. The posture of Lushaye's gesture is that China ’s increasingly vivid style of struggle in diplomatic fields, but daring to fightFighting; from the dare to fight to the good struggle, there is still a deep knowledge.Especially when encountering sensitive topics related to international law and sovereignty, it is advisable to be cautious and be careful.