On the 30th anniversary of the Hong Kong talks between the Straits Exchange Foundation and the Straits Cross -Strait Relations Association, a Chinese official media published an article on Saturday (September 10), saying that the original Qingyuan "1992 Consensus" was required, and the "1992 Consensus" was emphasized."One Middle" does not have "each table".
The CPPCC National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference reported on Saturday that it published an article called the original Qing source and the "1992 Consensus"."The tables of China", that is, both sides of the strait recognize that they belong to China, but the understanding of "China" is interpreted as "the Republic of China".
The article continued that in recent years, there are also the concepts of the Kuomintang high -level stealing concepts. When mentioning the "1992 Consensus", it further referred to it as "the" 92 Consensus 'Consensus' in the One Middle School "Essence
The article quotes observers on both sides of the strait, emphasizing that whether it is the "1992 Consensus", "One Middle School", or "the" 92 Consensus' Consensus of the One Middle School ", it must be clear, because this is not simpleThe name or habit of calling is the issue of legal and historical facts, and it is also a question of qualitative cross -strait relations. The above two claims reflect the question of some people in the Kuomintang who are still competing with the mainland to represent "China".
The article believes that after the establishment of the "New China" (the People's Republic of China in 1949), the convening of the New CPPCC has been resolved.The article said: "On October 1, 1949, with the establishment of the Central People's Government of the People's Republic of China, it has declared replacing the Republic of China government and becoming the only legal government representing the whole China."
Article articleSaid: "This is a replacement of the regime under the circumstances that the international law subject of China has not changed. China's sovereignty and inherent territorial territory have not changed.. "
For the" 1992 Consensus ", the article stated that 30 years ago, through the authorization of both sides of the strait, the Maritime Association and the Sea Foundation reached their own verbal expressions that" the consensus on both sides of the Taiwan Strait adheres to a Chinese principle "consensus in verbally.The core of its meaning is that "the two sides of the Taiwan Strait belong to the same China, and we work together to seek national unity."Consensus clearly defines the fundamental nature of cross -strait relations, and builds a political foundation for the negotiation of the two sessions. After the baptism of wind and rain, it has also become a common political foundation for the peaceful development of cross -strait political parties and the peaceful development of cross -strait relations.
The article said that Sun Yafu, a witness of the "1992 Consensus" and the current vice president of the Maritime Association, said that both sides in the consensus show that both sides of the Taiwan Strait adhere to the "one China" principle and strive to seek national unity attitude.Regarding the meaning of "one China", the sea base will indicate that the two sides have different perceptions. The Maritime Association said that it does not involve in transactional negotiations, and has dealt with the dispute over the shelter.
Sun Yafu said that this consensus is under the premise that the two sessions adhere to the principle of "one China" and strive to seek a unified state of the country, and temporarily put on hold on the differences in the "one China" political recognition, so as to achieve achievementof.This is the result of the political wisdom of seeking common deposits, and a classic case of seeking common groundwork.
The article also visited Liu Xiangping, director of the Taiwan Research Institute of Nanjing University. He said that the DPP has always refused to accept and recognize the "1992 Consensus" in order to engage in "Taiwan independence".In Taiwan, many elections failed to reflect on self -reflection. Instead, they blame the "1992 Consensus", distorted the "1992 Consensus", and even released the wind to "give up" and "1992 consensus."
Liu Xiangping criticized that the Kuomintang's swaying and backsturming practices, such as the Kuomintang, exacerbated the tension of cross -strait relations and reduced the expectations of compatriots on both sides of the Taiwan Straits to the peaceful development of cross -strait relations and the peaceful unity of the motherland.
Taiwan's blue and green parties have a different position on the "1992 Consensus".When the former president of Taiwan and former President of the Kuomintang Ma Ying -jeou attended the "Cross -Strait Re -boot" seminar in May last year, he mentioned that the two sides of the strait should return to the "original 92 consensus".Ma Ying -jeou believes that Taiwan should not deny the "1992 consensus", and mainland China should not attack the "one of the first China".
But at that time, the MAC refuted Ma Ying -jeou's statement that Taiwan had turned the historical page of the "1992 Consensus".Equation, democracy, and dialogue "called for the key to thinking and interaction on the other side.
The current Kuomintang Chairman Zhu Lilun said in the United States in June this year that the "1992 Consensus" is "consensus without consensus" and "creative vagueness".
