For the Air Force, and the military more broadly, the revelation casts a light on a bigger topic: the ever-more critical role of space as a contested domain. The shift has required more collaboration between the government and the proliferating commercial space sector.
The Air Force, the Space Force under the branch's purview, and other agencies have sought to capitalize on the changing landscape. They are seeking new satellite and launch capabilities, have pushed for more funding for initiatives in space and at times have crafted more creative contracts.
The effort has spanned multiple administrations, regardless of political affiliation, as the military aims to move more quickly and more affordably where possible.
"The military services that nations, great powers in particular, get from space are very important to their success. That's true for us. It's true for potential adversaries," Kendall said.
He added that the with all of this in mind.
The potential adversary the Pentagon is most focused on countering — on earth and arguably in space — is China. A possible conflict with Beijing was a major topic of the Air Force secretary's keynote at the AFA conference this week.
He said China is preparing for war with the U.S. but added that doesn't mean such a conflict is inevitable.
Kendall has been studying China's military buildup efforts for over a decade. That buildup has raised concerns, he said, about a Chinese strategy to design a force to deter and defeat American intervention in the Western Pacific by exploiting perceived U.S. vulnerabilities.
What would that mean if China invades Taiwan, or the perhaps more likely possibility of a blockade? Is the U.S. military in a position to counter that, if called upon?
"We are, but there's more operational risks than I would like to see. ... It would be a tragic mistake, I think, if China were to do the types of things you've just described, but they are actively seeking the capability to be effective against us, and to defeat us if possible, and we can't allow that to happen," said Kendall.
Air Force leadership has been taking steps to deter next-generation technological threats. It has a list of "operational imperatives" that span everything from modernization of the air-based leg of the nuclear triad, with the B-21 Raider that's expected to make its first flight later this year, to a "space order-of-battle," to the development of a sixth-generation fighter jet in the Next Generation Air Dominance competition.
The plan for NGAD also involves what the service refers to as uncrewed Collaborative Combat Aircraft, or drones. The Air Force is dedicating billions of dollars to autonomous capabilities over the next five years, believing the technology is mature enough and cost-effective.
Like other aspects of the government and the private sector, the Air Force is also incorporating artificial intelligence applications.
"It's really a basket of technologies that offer a different range of capabilities. Military applications include autonomy, pattern recognition, data, analytics, and so on, with some of the functions that humans would normally perform to be automated and done much more accurately and more quickly through AI," Kendall said.
"We are not talking about turning over control of lethality to machines — that is not what we have in mind," he said. "Humans will always be in the loop and responsible for any decisions that are made about lethality. But we cannot ignore this technology, it's going to provide a huge military advantage."
So much hinges, though, on the future of defense policy and funding. As has happened multiple times in recent years, Congress appears unlikely to pass a fiscal 2024 budget before a end-of-the-month deadline.
Analysts expect lawmakers to pass a continuing resolution (CR) that temporarily maintains the status quo on government spending. But there is also the rising risk of a partial government shutdown, or even more detrimental to military modernization, the growing possibility of an extended CR.
"That would be devastating," Kendall said. "All CRs have a very negative impact. They're very inefficient. They delay modernization that is very important. They delay increases in programs that are going into production, for example, and then make it very difficult for us to plan and to move forward."
