(United Nations French New Dian) experts believe that Russia's invasion of Ukraine has once again highlighted the United Nations' power to prevent international conflicts.

The UN Security Council held an emergency meeting on Thursday. Secretary -General Gutres and other Security Council members called on Russian President Putin not to invade Ukraine.Putin delivered a national television speech at the same time, announcing special military operations in Ukraine.

Ukraine's resident representative of the United Nations Caselia said emotionally at the meeting: "I ask you to do everything to stop this war."

HoweverGao Wan, a UN expert of the International Crisis Organization Think Tank: "The United Nations Security Council can never resolve this crisis ... This is because Russia has the veto power, and Putin obviously does not care about international public opinion or diplomacy."

Sure enough, a draft resolution that the Security Council condemned Russia to invade Ukraine and called on its immediately withdrawn from Russia was rejected by Russia.Western countries had to retreat and hold a special meeting of the United Nations Conference to discuss Russia's invasion of Ukraine.It is expected that the conference will adopt a resolution on Wednesday to condemn Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

In the Federal University voting, none of the 193 member states have veto, but the decision passed by the United University is different from the Security Council's resolution. It is just suggestions and has no legal binding power.

Since its establishment in 1945, the United Nations has not successfully prevented the conflict provoked by the five permanent members.The United Kingdom, China, France, Russia and the United States have veto power, which can be described as great power, so that the role of the United Nations mainly focuses on providing humanitarian assistance to natural disasters and post -war. Only a few cases can successfully limit the expansion of conflicts.

The United Nations has been in a deadlock in reform over the years

Experts and governments have long advocated that the current multi -pole international order should be considered and reforming the Security Council.India, Japan, and Germany believe that they should have a seat of permanent councils.

However, the reform of the reform has been in a deadlock for many years, which not only damages the reputation of the Security Council, but also often causes it to do nothing because of the internal crickets.

Chaseck, director of the Political Department of Manhattan University, said: "Basically, let the fox guard the chicken house. Because of this, the Security Council also returns to the deadlock during the Cold War."

SomeThe UN observer said that this invasion not only showed the failure of Gutres' personal failure, but also another proof of the decline in the status of the United Nations.Gao Wan said: "The United Nations Security Council is currently a theater that allows the West and Russia to shout each other ... It has no effect on ending this war."