The China Embassy in Japan said that it was not invited to join the international moni

In response to the Japanese media that China refused to join the international monitoring mechanism of Fukushima nuclear waste water, the Chinese embassy in Japan was rumored, saying that China was not invited to participate.

According to the WeChat public account of the "Chinese Embassy in Japan", a spokesman for the Chinese embassy in Japan on Thursday (September 7) responded to the above -mentioned reports in the form of reporters in the form of reporters, saying that "falseinformation".

A spokesman said that the facts were the analysis of the nuclear waste water sample collected by Japan's own collection of nuclear wastewater samples collected by Japan, but China was not invited to participate.

A spokesman said that the data of Fukushima nuclear waste water so far is sampled, tested and released in Japan. "Of course, such data cannot be trusted by the international community."Based on the laboratory comparison activities based on Japan's samples, the true reliability of Japan's test results cannot be fully proved, and it cannot be equivalent to the substantial participation and long -term effective international monitoring mechanism of interests.

A spokesman said that China did not refuse the dialogue, and it has clearly proposed that long -term effective international monitoring mechanisms should be established, and it is called on Japan to show the sincerity of solving reasonable concerns of neighboring countries without imposing its own monitoring results in people to othersEssence

The Kyodo News Agency on Tuesday (5th) quoted sources from Japan -China relations saying that the Japanese government has repeatedly called on China to join the international mechanism of the detection of Fukushima nuclear waste water through diplomatic channels this year, so that China can be right to deal withThe movement of Fukushima nuclear waste water discharge was scientifically judged.However, it is reported that China has questioned the effectiveness of the mechanism and believes that this cannot guarantee the independence of analysis and evaluation, so it has not accepted the proposal.