Chinese official and Ukrainian President Zelezki finally spoke.This is the first time in February last year since Russia's full invasion of Ukraine.

Europe and the United States are generally given positive evaluation. The United States is definitely "good", and the chairman of the European Commission Feng Delin pointed out that the call is "late" but "important".In retrospect, some European officials and politicians such as French President Macron, in order to invite China to the end of the media, and put on political capital, of course, they are even more happy to see this result.

For Xi Ze's call on April 26, the information released by Ukraine is quite positive. Zelei Sky described the call as "long and meaningful", and discussed the realization of "fair, lasting peace and possible cooperation".The tone of the deputy director of the Ukrainian President's Office, Sirbyha, is more positive, claiming that "the war has taken another important step."However, Zeelianzky also emphasized that it would not be exchanged for peace at the cost of sacrificing the territory, and truly reflecting the road of peace talks was by no means a Ma Pingchuan.

According to the information issued by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China, Chinese officials stated in the call that respect for mutual respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity is the political basis of Sino -Ukraine relations.This is the first guarantee to Zeleiski that China does not recognize and support Russia's occupation of Ukrainian territory, and also implies that countries around the world should not double the marks on Taiwan issues.

Chinese officials also vigorously show the image of China's "peacemaker", emphasizing that China "neither watching fires across the shore nor pouring fuel to fire, let alone taking advantage of the opportunity."These words are ridiculed by India and the United States. What is prominent is that China "is bright and positive", which is different from other countries.

The most important information brought by China -Ukraine's call is that China will send "Russia" and the Chinese government Eurasian affairs to visit countries in Ukraine to communicate in depth with all parties on the political solution of crisis.This is a clear signal that marks that China has begun to participate in persuasion and talk, and intervene in mediation with actual actions.

Some European officials and comments believe that the words of the Chinese ambassador to France Losano last week were the fuse of the Chinese official's official Kenzeski phone call, because Lushawan questioned the statement of the status of Ukraine's sovereignty. ChinaIt is necessary to dilute its adverse effects as soon as possible.

Another European officials believe that Chinese officials finally talk to Zelezki, thanks to Macron, and even the chairman of the European Commission, Feng Delin, can remember.On April 6th, Ma and Feng met with Chinese and French and European officials in Beijing. In addition to raising concerns about Chinese human rights and other issues, they also promoted China to use their influence on Russia to mediate Russia to mediate RussiaThe Black War played a greater role.After the meeting, Feng Delin revealed that Chinese officials expressed their willingness to talk to Zellezki when conditions and time matured.After that meeting, some Western comments criticized the two to return without merit, and Macron was also "pushed" by Chinese officials.Now it seems that their lobbying is not completely useless.

So why did China talk about the head of China and Ukraine, was forced by Lu Shaye?Or is Macron's lobbying with Feng Delin?The real answer may be: China has long been preparing and has been waiting for the best time.

The best time to ensure the most likely to ensure the success of mediation and the smallest resistance; China is regarded as a passive intervention rather than active attack, and China's image as a responsible country must be strengthened.Fisheries.

In fact, on February 24 this year, China released a Chinese position document on the first anniversary of the Russia and Ukraine War on the Ukrainian crisis, showing that China has been ready.One of the important backgrounds is that the Russian and Ukraine War is long -lasting. Whether it is Russia, Ukraine or the United States and Europe, it feels like the spring counterattack in Ukraine.By this month, Macron and von derine visited China to "invite China to play", and the time was mature, and only the problem of choosing specific days was left.

After taking the first step, whether China can essentially play a role in persuasion and role, all parties have different opinions.The questioner believes that China must fight against the West with its own interests to resist the west. Although the first article announced in February is "respect for the sovereignty of various countries", China has not condemned Russia so far.Russia withdrew troops, so it is difficult to believe that neutrality in China will not be "pro -Russian -style neutral", and mediation will not be biased.

However, such an idea may not reflect China's strategic computing, and it is more likely to underestimate China's ambitions in the Chinese and American competition pattern.The Russian and Ukraine War has led to geopolitical tension, continuous and incidentally caused the turbulence of Northeast Asia, and the issue of many countries in the world in the Taiwan Strait. China has repeatedly emphasized that Taiwan's issue has repeatedly emphasized that the issue of Taiwan is the core of China's "core interests."It is also important that after a long time ago, Saudi Arabia and Iran have resumed diplomatic relations, China is likely to seek a display of diplomacy again, showing that it can provide effective solutions different from Washington when dealing with international issues.

So, can Beijing successfully mediate the Russian and Ukraine War?How easy is this, and it is not the goal that any country can achieve with its own power.However, China has already put on a posture, and it will not be just doing it. I believe it will strive for effort to help Europe achieve peace or ceasefire at an early date.This is a more difficult diplomatic test than the mediation Shati, and it will also be another kind of competition in China and the United States, which reflects another vane of international geopolitical direction.