Li Haoshi, a Chinese talk show actor named "HOUSE", stepped on the Chinese speech minefield in China last weekend.The official severe punishment has also attracted the attention of domestic and foreign public opinion.

This storm was first ignited by a Weibo post.Some netizens posted on May 13 that when they performed the comedy company "Xiao Guo Culture" on the same day, a paragraph caused discomfort."A talk show actor (I won't name it) said that I had adopted two wild dogs. The two wild dogs felt different. When he saw these two wild dogs, they were chasing the squirrels.The puppy made him feel cute and cute, and it was cute. These two wild dogs reminded him of eight words, 'excellent style, can win the battle'. "

To understand why this paragraph causes such a fierce response in China, we must first understand the context of Chinese.One of the major problems is in the metaphor of the "wild dog". The dogs are derogatory in Chinese. The words used for abusive people include "pigs and dogs", "dog slaves" and "dog traitor".Li Haoshi mentioned that "excellent style and victory in the battle" is one of the goals proposed by the Chinese official Chinese official in 2013.

The negative comments on the Chinese ruling party and the army have always been the topic of China. Obviously, Li Haoshi's paragraph has the meaning of the PLA describing the PLA, which seriously touched the Chinese red line and stepped on the lightning area.

Some of the voice that defended Li Haoshi believes that the talk show was originally a offending art, and it is a manifestation of freedom of speech. Some jokes to touch sensitive issues should be tolerant.Opponents believe that this discussion is not appropriate, because even in the Western talk show, there are taboo topics. If anyone joked with homosexual or Nazi issues, it will also be criticized.

In the context of China, Li Haoshi's joke this time was "big". When he stepped on the red line, it was inevitable to bear the consequences for this.The question is, to what extent should the official punishment be done for such remarks?

In the past week, the official handling of this incident has been upgraded step by step.After the fermentation of public opinion, the official public account of the Western theater and the official media and People's Daily all commented on May 15.With such a "talk show" in the western theater, the children were very angry!Posted on the title, saying that "seeing such a idiot's shameless remarks, I still really feel provocative, insult and anger."The People's Daily warned that the bluish was derailed in the short review of Weibo, and the stalk had to be played.

The official post order the incident to further enter the field of public opinion. Many netizens urged the officials to severely punish the actors and companies involved in the case, and some even asked to rectify the entire talk show industry.Some comments have labels the discipline, malicious attacks, and the "Routing Party" for Li Haoshi, describing the incident as the political incident of actors deliberately planning and attacking the PLA.

It is worth noting that the former editor -in -chief of the Global Times and well -known big V Hu Xijin made a three -day post between May 15th and May 17th to try to cool down the incident.

He appealed in the post on May 15th that society needs its position and principles to be firm, and at the same time, there must be necessary fault -tolerant space.On the 16th, he also advocated that on the basis of making corresponding penalties, he should give House and Xiao Guo a deep reflection and make opportunities for improving, and do not need to be "killed in one stick."

However, Hu Xijin's post not only did not achieve the cooling effect, but attracted more netizens to criticize.

With the continuous fermentation of public opinion, the Beijing Culture and Tourism Bureau announced on May 17 that administrative penalties for Xiaoguo Culture Company, which belong to Li Haoshi, warned and confiscated illegal income of more than 1.32 million yuan (more than S $ 250,000) The fine of more than 1.335 million yuan; the relevant violations of the personnel involved in the case and its performance brokerage agencies and the operating units operated by the performance field will further be held accountable in accordance with laws and regulations, and suspended all the performance activities involved in the company in Beijing indefinitely.

The police also reported that the incident had caused a bad social impact on the same day, and the public security organs had filed a case in accordance with the law.

The scope of this incident has further expanded on May 17.A Dalian woman was accused of questioning the relevant topic of "House, a talk show artist under Xiaoguo Culture, and accused of offending the PLA." She should not be permanently blocked by the artist. At the same time, she wrote "Isn't the soldier brother who is a dog brother?"She was reported and was subsequently detained by the police.

The process of

incident upgrades highlight China's current public opinion environment.Under the banner of patriotism, emotional and fierce voices, it has become the mainstream of public opinion; relatively rational voice, such as Hu Xijin's speech, has been criticized, and the inclusiveness of the overall public opinion environment has been reduced.

From the official initial response, the official did not plan to involve the police from the beginning, but instead adopted a criticism of official media.However, the official criticism and the fierce atmosphere of public opinion have produced the effect of mutual support, and promoted the continuous upgrade of the incident.

At the time point for China to revitalize the economy, a highly tight public opinion environment is not conducive to social harmony, is not conducive to innovation and economic development, and is not conducive to China's international image.In the past few days, there have been some more rational voices calling on the official "precise processing" talk show.Perhaps for officials, compared to the red line and sacrifice to severely punish the means of punishment, how to avoid various events from "going online" in the current public opinion atmosphere is a difficult problem to test the ability of official public opinion.